Photo by Road Trip with Raj on Unsplash
Photo by Road Trip with Raj on Unsplash

NEWS BRIEFING and EXPERT REACTION: Retraining the brain for chronic pain

Embargoed until: Publicly released:
Peer-reviewed: This work was reviewed and scrutinised by relevant independent experts.

Randomised controlled trial: Subjects are randomly assigned to a test group, which receives the treatment, or a control group, which commonly receives a placebo. In 'blind' trials, participants do not know which group they are in; in ‘double blind’ trials, the experimenters do not know either. Blinding trials helps removes bias.

People: This is a study based on research using people.

******BRIEFING RECORDING AVAILABLE******* Retraining the brain to better process emotions could be an effective therapy for chronic pain, according to Aussie researchers. The randomised controlled trial focused on the experiences of 89 people with chronic pain, and included a therapy which aimed to improve the patients' ability to deescalate negative emotions and enhance positive ones. Those who received the new treatment reported better emotional regulation, as well as pain reduction within a six-month follow-up. Tune into our online briefing to hear from the lead authors of the study, as well as a trial participant who will be available during the Q&A session.

Journal/conference: JAMA Network Open

Research: Paper

Organisation/s: The University of New South Wales, The University of Adelaide, University of Technology Sydney (UTS)

Funder: Funding/Support: This work was supported by the Rebecca L. Cooper Medical Research Foundation and grant 2027056 from the MRFF (Prof Gustin). The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Ms Norman-Nott reported receiving grants from the Australian Commonwealth Government Research Training Program and Neuroscience Research Australia during the conduct of the study. Dr Briggs reported receiving grants from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation outside the submitted work. Dr Diwan reported receiving grants from Globus Medical-Nuvasive and research funding from Baxter Philanthropy outside the submitted work. Dr Suh reported being employed by Microsoft Research during the conduct of the study. Dr Newby reported receiving grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia during the conduct of the study and grants from the National Institute for health and Care Research, KONESKI, Wellcome Trust, and Medical Research Fund Future (MRFF) outside the submitted work. Prof McAuley reported receiving grants from the NHMRC of Australia during the conduct of the study and grants from MRFF outside the submitted work. Prof Gustin reported receiving grants from the NHMRC of Australia, MRFF, New South Wales Health, Wings for Life, and the US Department of Defense during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Media release

From: Australian Science Media Centre

Date: Mon 05 May 2025
Start Time: 10:00am AEST
Duration: Approx 45 min 
Venue: Online - Zoom

Speakers:

  • Professor Sylvia Gustin is the Director of the Neurorecovery Research Hub, University of New South Wales and Director of the Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia
  • Dr Nell Norman-Nott is Research Fellow & Clinical Trial Manager at the University of New South Wales and Neuroscience Research Australia

Briefings are free to attend, but if you like what we do, you can donate to the Australian Science Media Centre here

Attachments:

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public

  • JAMA
    Web page
    The URL will go live after the embargo lifts.
  • Australian Science Media Centre
    Web page
    Briefing recording playback
  • The University of New South Wales
    Web page

Expert Reaction

These comments have been collated by the Science Media Centre to provide a variety of expert perspectives on this issue. Feel free to use these quotes in your stories. Views expressed are the personal opinions of the experts named. They do not represent the views of the SMC or any other organisation unless specifically stated.

Dr Rob Schütze is a Senior Lecturer in clinical psychology at Curtin University, and a Senior Clinical Psychologist at the Royal Perth Hospital Multidisciplinary Pain Management Centre

Australians are desperately in need of accessible and effective pain care that treats the whole person, not just injured body parts. At least one in five people live with daily, persistent pain which takes a huge toll physically, mentally and socially. Being in pain makes it hard to do the things you love so it’s very common to develop emotional problems like anxiety and depression. More than half of those living with chronic pain also have an anxiety or mood disorder. Research shows that pain and distress bounce off each other – they have reciprocal effects. Gold standard treatments for chronic pain have long tried to target emotional distress and there’s lots of evidence that different psychological therapies help, including cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and mindfulness-based therapies (e.g. MBCT, MBSR). However these aren’t a silver bullet, generally showing modest effects that alleviate the symptoms rather than curing the problem.

The study recently published by Dr Norman-Nott and Prof Gustin in JAMA this week is a promising development in the effort to help people struggling with the emotional fallout of living with unremitting pain. It is based on a well-established psychological therapy originally developed to help people with borderline personality disorder - Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT). A key feature of DBT is helping people to understand and express their emotions better. There are several other clinical trials showing DBT is promising for people with pain, so this isn’t entirely novel. Because pain activates both sensory and affective networks in the brain, reducing negative emotion helps turn down the volume on pain, especially the “bothersomeness” of pain. Instead of bottling emotions up, lashing out when angry, or  avoiding things that feel scary, we want people in pain to get better at processing their feelings, calming their nervous system, and solving everyday problems.

This is actually a core feature of most pain psychology interventions, so the iDBT-Pain intervention is not novel in this respect. However, there is probably a bigger “dose” of emotion regulation content than we see in pain-focused CBT, the most common and well-validated psychological pain therapy.

The effect sizes found in this study were mostly modest, much like other pain therapies. However, there was a large effect size in reducing depression in the short term (9 weeks), and pain intensity in the medium term (21 weeks).

Most of the improvements (e.g. emotion regulation, anxiety, stress, trauma symptoms, general wellbeing) were short-term, disappearing after people stopped the treatment. This is disappointing because the central aim of pain management interventions is long-term change. Previous research mirrors this, showing most interventions wear off within a year.

Encouragingly, improvements in pain intensity and depression were felt at the 5 month mark, or about 3 months after people stopped the treatment. Hopefully this is because people kept using the skills they learnt in the program. But we need more research to understand this.

iDBT-pain did not improve pain interference in the short or medium term. This is disappointing because, aside from alleviating pain, helping people to function better in their lives is the holy grail of all pain management programs.

A novel and valuable feature of iDBT-pain is the way it’s delivered in hybrid form, using written materials, an app with multimedia content, and online group sessions to teach people the emotion regulation skills.This blended format encourages people to practice these skills at home, while still giving them exposure to psychologists and other people struggling with pain. This hybrid approach is promising because it is more efficient than traditional one-on-one psychological therapy, so more people could potentially access it.

Overall, this study shows that iDBT-pain seems to be about as good as existing pain psychology treatments. It may be especially helpful for people in pain who struggle with emotional distress and are able to navigate technology to practice skills like meditation at home.

More research is needed to show that this is helpful in the long term.

As always, the best outcomes in pain management come from person-centred care that targets all aspects of a person’s pain experience, often with input from different health professionals. While improving emotion regulation is important, something like iDBT-pain won’t replace the need for interdisciplinary care, for example from physiotherapists, pain specialists, nurses and occupational therapists, and psychologists working together.

A good resource on pain management is the painHEALTH website: https://painhealth.csse.uwa.edu.au

Last updated: 12 May 2025 10:40am
Declared conflicts of interest:
I hold research grants, paid to my university, from the Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF), an Australian Government medical research funding agency; I have received research grants, paid to my university or health service, from the Future Health Research and Innovation Fund, Raine Medical Research Foundation, Woke Pharmaceuticals, RPH Research Foundation, and the Insurance Commission of Western Australia; I have received small honoraria and conference support for giving lectures on the biopsychosocial management of pain; I am a director of Yoga Space Perth Pty Ltd, a private business that provides health care to people with pain and other conditions; I am a member of the International Association for the Study of Pain and the Australian Clinical Psychology Association

Professor Lorimer Moseley AO is a Bradley Distinguished Professor, Foundation Chair in Physiotherapy at UniSA, Chair of PainAdelaide and Founder and CEO of the non-profit Pain Revolution

Chronic pain - pain on most days for three months or more - can be brutal and take a significant toll on those who experience it. It is one of the most challenging and burdensome health problems we face. If you or a loved one has significant chronic pain, you will know that the constant and unpleasant nature of it can make it hard to regulate how you feel in response to a wide array of situations.

This clinical trial shows that psychological treatment can help, just as it can help people without chronic pain. That’s not very surprising. It also raises the possibility - but does not prove it - that treating emotional dysregulation can also improve pain levels. Old ideas of how pain works can’t explain that, but modern ideas can - our pain system is extraordinarily complex and the sensitivity of our pain system can be modified moment to moment and gradually over time through a wide range of strategies.

The best treatments we have for chronic pain are grounded in high quality education and active and psychological strategies that gradually reduce pain system hypersensitivity. We don’t know if this psychological intervention offers any benefit over any other intervention, but it raises the possibility that it might.

Last updated: 06 May 2025 4:24pm
Declared conflicts of interest:
Lorimer collaborates closely with a few authors of this study, however did not know about this study in particular Unpaid founder and CEO of the non-profit Pain Revolution Unpaid board member of the Australian Pain Solutions Research Alliance Advisor ConnectHealth UK NHS Pain and musculoskeletal services and Flippin Pain public health initiative Received travel support from Reality Health Pain Education platform Receives royalties from 8 books on pain
Dr Nahian Chowdhury is a Research Fellow/Conjoint Lecturer at Neuroscience Research Australia

This study by Norman-Nott and colleagues offers evidence that targeting emotion regulation is a viable intervention for chronic pain. While emotion dysregulation has long been linked to chronic pain, this is one of the first trials to show that teaching emotion regulation skills is helpful for individuals suffering from chronic pain— and do so effectively online and in group settings.This is a game changer for people with limited access to in-person care, such as those in rural and remote communities.

The study's methodological rigour is strong, with a pre-registered sample size of 90 determined via power analysis, aligning with gold-standard clinical trial protocols. Most importantly, the intervention outperformed treatment as usual — a critical benchmark. Chronic pain is typically managed with a mix of physiotherapy, medications, and psychological support, and while those are helpful, this study shows emotion regulation training can offer more. Thus, this research marks a major step forward in pain care — not just treating symptoms, but empowering people to better manage the emotional challenges that control their pain experience.

Last updated: 06 May 2025 1:22pm
Declared conflicts of interest:
Nahian is at the same institutional center for pain and on the same team as some of the authors, but did not have a role in this paper.

News for:

Australia
NSW
SA

Multimedia:

  • Video 1

    Attribution: Sylvia Gustin and Nell Norman-Nott, UNSW and NeuRA

    Permission Category: © - Only use with this story

    Last Modified: 30 Apr 2025 11:11am

    Download video file: Video 1

    Note: High resolution video files are only available for download here by registered journalists who are logged in.

  • Video 2

    Attribution: Sylvia Gustin and Nell Norman-Nott, UNSW and NeuRA

    Permission Category: © - Only use with this story

    Last Modified: 30 Apr 2025 11:12am

    Download video file: Video 2

    Note: High resolution video files are only available for download here by registered journalists who are logged in.

  • Nell and Sylvia
    Nell and Sylvia

    Professor Sylvia Gustin and Dr Nell Norman-Nott, both from UNSW and NeuRA.

    File size: 574.6 KB

    Attribution: Sylvia Gustin and Nell Norman-Nott, UNSW and NeuRA

    Permission category: © - Only use with this story

    Last modified: 08 Jul 2025 10:52pm

    NOTE: High resolution files can only be downloaded here by registered journalists who are logged in.

  • Pain and emotional therapy app
    Pain and emotional therapy app

    File size: 2.5 MB

    Attribution: Professor Sylvia Gustin and Dr Nell Norman-Nott, UNSW and NeuRA.

    Permission category: © - Only use with this story

    Last modified: 08 Jul 2025 10:52pm

    NOTE: High resolution files can only be downloaded here by registered journalists who are logged in.

  • Pain and emotional therapy image
    Pain and emotional therapy image

    A=zoom sessions, B = Printed Manual, C = App.

    File size: 3.1 MB

    Attribution: Professor Sylvia Gustin and Dr Nell Norman-Nott, both from UNSW and NeuRA.

    Permission category: © - Only use with this story

    Last modified: 08 Jul 2025 10:52pm

    NOTE: High resolution files can only be downloaded here by registered journalists who are logged in.

Show less
Show more

Media contact details for this story are only visible to registered journalists.