Kids who check their phones all the time at school have poorer self control

Publicly released:
International
Photo by 凝 夏 on Unsplash
Photo by 凝 夏 on Unsplash

Students who check their phones a lot at school score worse on self-control tests than kids who don't, according to international researchers. They say it's the number of times kids pick up their phones, rather than the total screen time, that appears to be most closely linked to self-control issues. The researchers looked at smartphone data from 79 kids aged 11-18, and found there was not a single hour of school day when kids were not using their phones, with children spending a total of 2.22 hours of the school day glued to their screens, on average. Individual students checked their phone nearly 65 times a day, on average, the researchers say, and those who checked their phone more often scored worse on a task that assesses self-control skills needed to pay attention in class. The researchers say it's unclear if phone use is degrading students' self control or if students with poorer self control are more attached to their phones, but efforts to address smartphone use in schools should focus on kids' smartphone checking behaviours and their link with attention problems, rather than just total screen time.

News release

From: JAMA

Smartphone Use During School Hours and Association With Cognitive Control in Youths Aged 11 to 18 Years

About The Study: This cross-sectional study found that youths use smartphones approximately one-third of the school day; this use was associated with reduced cognitive control. These findings highlight the need for school-level policies and digital literacy programs that address not only overall screen time but also habitual smartphone-checking behaviors that fragment attention.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research JAMA, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
JAMA Network Open
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: University of North Carolina, USA
Funder: This work was supported by funding from the Winston Family Foundation.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.