Close-up image of a kākāpō. CREDIT: Jake Osborne
Close-up image of a kākāpō. CREDIT: Jake Osborne

Kākāpō on Rakiura in good genetic health despite being more inbred

Embargoed until: Publicly released:
Peer-reviewed: This work was reviewed and scrutinised by relevant independent experts.

An international research team, including New Zealanders, analysed almost 50 kākāpō genomes, finding the current population on Rakiura/Stewart Island is more in-bred - but shows fewer harmful mutations - than a now-extinct mainland population. One explanation is that Rakiura kākāpō may have “purged” more harmful mutations than their mainland relatives, from whom they separated around 10,000 years ago. The team says their analysis shows small populations can survive even when isolated for hundreds of generations, and this work provides key insights into kākāpō breeding and recovery.

Journal/conference: Cell Genomics

Link to research (DOI): 10.1016/j.xgen.2021.100002

Organisation/s: University of Otago, Department of Conservation, The Genetic Rescue Foundation, NZ; Centre for Palaeogenetics, Sweden; Swedish Museum of Natural History; Stockholm University, Sweden; University of Copenhagen, Denmark; University of Edinburgh, UK; Uppsala University, Sweden; National Institutes of Health, USA; Pacific Biosciences, USA; Wellcome Sanger Institute, UK; University of California - Davis, USA; Bionano Genomics, USA; The Rockefeller University, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, USA; European Bioinformatics Institute, UK; BioSkryb Genomics, USA

Funder: L.D. and N.D. acknowledge support from FORMAS (grant 2015-676) and the Swiss National Science Foundation (Postdoc Mobility grants P2SKP3_165031 and P300PA_177845), respectively. H.E.M. was funded by an EMBO fellowship (grant 1111-2018) and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under a Marie Sk1odowska-Curie grant (840519). K.G. acknowledges support from FORMAS (grant 2016-00835). B.C.R. acknowledges financial support from UO Zoology funding for sample preparation (Kākāpō 125+ project and kākāpō museum samples). E.D.J. acknowledges support from HHMI. A.R. and A.M.P. were supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health. The work of V.K. and F.T.-N. was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. L.H. and F.J.M. were supported by the Wellcome Trust Q15 (grant 108749/Z/15/Z) and the European Molecular Biology Laboratory. V.E.K. is financially supported by the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation as part of the National Bioinformatics Infrastructure Sweden at SciLifeLab.

Media release

From: Cell Press

After 10,000 years of inbreeding, endangered flightless parrots from New Zealand are in surprisingly good genetic health.

Before humans made their way to New Zealand, the critically endangered flightless parrot known as the kākāpō likely numbered in the hundreds of thousands. By 1995, their numbers had dwindled to just 51 birds, including 50 isolated on tiny Stewart Island and a single male, known as Richard Henry, all alone on the mainland. Today, those numbers have grown to about 200 individuals.

Now, the first genome sequencing of the species offer some surprisingly good news: despite 10,000 years of island isolation and inbreeding, the kākāpō appear to have lost potentially deleterious mutations rather than accumulating them. In fact, they now carry fewer deleterious mutations than now-extinct populations on the mainland once did. The analyses, conducted by researchers from Sweden and New Zealand, are reported September 8 in the journal Cell Genomics.

“Even though the kākāpō is one of the most inbred and endangered bird species in the world, it has many fewer harmful mutations than expected,” says Nicolas Dussex, a researcher at the Center for Palaeogenetics and Stockholm University. “Our data shows that the surviving population on Stewart Island has been isolated for approximately 10,000 years and that during this time, harmful mutations have been removed by natural selection in a process called ‘purging’ and that inbreeding may have facilitated it.”

“In small populations, this type of harmful mutation can lead to genetic diseases,” adds Love Dalén (@love_dalen), of the Center for Palaeogenetics and Swedish Museum of Natural History. “Our finding of a reduced number of harmful mutations is therefore important, since it means that inbreeding in the present-day population is likely to have less severe impact than we had initially thought.”

In the new study, the researchers report the first genome-wide analyses of the kākāpō, including a high-quality genome assembly. All together, they sequenced and analyzed 49 kākāpō genomes, including 35 representing members of the sole surviving island population and 14 representatives from the extinct mainland population.

In small populations, scientific theory suggests that deleterious mutations may accumulate, leading to an increased risk for extinction. But it’s also possible that detrimental gene variants, exposed through inbreeding, could instead be eliminated from the population by natural selection, a process known as purging. In the new study, the researchers now find that the latter possibility more accurately describes what’s happened in the case of the kākāpō.

The researchers say that the findings can now be put to practical use in efforts to protect and grow the remaining population. For example, the genome data can be used to select breeding individuals that may be most helpful for future generations. “We show that the single male survivor from the mainland, Richard Henry, has more harmful mutations than Stewart Island birds,” Dalén says. “Therefore, there could be a risk that these harmful mutations spread in future generations.”

On the other hand, Richard Henry is also genetically distinct and may carry useful genetic diversity, he adds. This means that careful consideration must be given to pros and cons. It will therefore be important to carefully monitor the health and genomes of Richard Henry’s offspring to ensure they don’t introduce harmful mutations to the island population.

The findings in kākāpō also have implications for endangered and small populations more broadly. “Our results are good news, not only for kākāpō but also for the conservation of other highly inbred and isolated species, because they suggest that it is possible, under some circumstances, for small populations to survive even if isolated for hundreds of generations,” says Bruce Robertson, University of Otago, who has studied kākāpō genetics for 25 years.

“While the species is still critically endangered, this result is encouraging as it shows that a large number of genetic defects have been lost over time and that high inbreeding alone may not necessarily mean that the species is doomed to extinction,” Dussex says. “It thus gives us some hope for the long-term survival of the kākāpō as well as other species with a similar population history.”

The researchers plan to continue investigating other extremely inbred avian and mammalian species to produce studies similar to this one. An important goal is to find out whether the health of today’s kākāpō is a rare exception, whereas most endangered species instead tend to accumulate harmful mutations.

News for:

New Zealand
International

Media contact details for this story are only visible to registered journalists.