It is easy being green, if you shift all your pollution abroad

Publicly released:
International
Industrial pollution. Wikimedia Commons, CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)
Industrial pollution. Wikimedia Commons, CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)

Democratic countries tend to be rated as 'greener', or more environmentally friendly, compared to other countries, but this may be because they're shifting the burden of their own pollution overseas, according to Swiss and UK scientists. The team analysed 161 countries between 1990 and 2015, looking at links between democracy and 'offshoring' pollution. They found democratic countries tended to offshore environmentally-damaging products and processes more than other countries, which reduces local greenhouse gas emissions. Emissions for more democratic nations were over one metric ton per capita lower when increasing pollution offshoring, compared to less democratic nations. The findings suggest democracies cannot consider themselves to occupy the moral high ground over autocracies when it comes to being green, the authors say, and these countries should develop environmental polices that focus on their global, rather than local, environmental impact.

Media release

From: PLOS

Shifting pollution abroad is a major reason why democratic countries are rated more environmentally friendly compared to non-democratic states

Democratic countries tend to be rated “greener”, or more environmentally friendly, compared to other countries—but this may be because they more often outsource the environmental impacts of their consumption to other nations, according to a study published May 14, 2025, in the open-access journal PLOS Climate by Thomas Bernauer and Ella Henninger from ETH Zurich, Switzerland and Tobias Böhmelt from the University of Essex.

Prior studies suggest that democracies have a better environmental protection record compared to more authoritarian nations. Here, the authors investigated the link between democracy and environmental behaviors—in particular, focusing on “pollution offshoring” (when countries shift their production and/or consumption patterns so that highly polluting goods or processes are made or take place abroad instead of domestically) and the environmental impact of this.

Bernauer, Böhmelt, and Henninger analyzed 161 countries individually between 1990-2015 on, focusing on the relationship between democracy and pollution offshoring, and then evaluating how democratic pollution offshoring correlates to domestic environmental pollution as measured by greenhouse gas emissions.

They found that democratic countries tended to offshore environmentally-damaging products and processes significantly more than other countries. Their analysis also showed that pollution offshoring was significantly associated with lower emission levels locally, particularly for countries categorized as more democratic: greenhouse gas emissions for these more democratic nations were over one metric ton per capita lower (-1.55; -0.45) when increasing pollution offshoring, compared to less democratic nations. These findings call into question the moral high ground of democracies versus autocracies in terms of environmental protection, and suggest that particularly high-income democracies should seek to reorient environmental polices to focus on the global environmental impact of their domestic economic activity.

The authors add: “We provide one of the first systematic studies on how much “pollution offshoring” is associated with domestic (territorial) emission levels in democracies. The main result is that pollution offshoring is linked significantly and substantively with lower greenhouse gas emissions “at home” in democracies.”

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research PLOS, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
PLOS Climate
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: University of Essex, UK, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
Funder: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.