EXPERT REACTION: Tonga eruption caused “exceptionally rare” pressure wave - lasting 6 days

Publicly released:
New Zealand; Pacific; International
Pressure wave of Hunga Tonga eruption recorded January 2022 in Switzerland - Creative Commons - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pressure-wave-Hunga-Tonga-eruption-2022.png
Pressure wave of Hunga Tonga eruption recorded January 2022 in Switzerland - Creative Commons - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pressure-wave-Hunga-Tonga-eruption-2022.png

Six days after the Tonga volcano blew in January, scientists were still detecting traces of the eruption using global pressure-sensing instruments. A large international expert team - combining 76 researchers from 17 countries, including New Zealand - used these instruments to study the shock waves from the eruption. They recorded a rare “Lamb wave” – an atmospheric gravity wave that’s sparked by large disturbances like volcanic eruptions. This wave signal circled the whole globe at least four times during the six days following the eruption - and the recording of this wave is a world-first.

Media release

From:

Expert Reaction

These comments have been collated by the Science Media Centre to provide a variety of expert perspectives on this issue. Feel free to use these quotes in your stories. Views expressed are the personal opinions of the experts named. They do not represent the views of the SMC or any other organisation unless specifically stated.

Dr Geoff Kilgour, Senior Volcanologist, GNS Science

This is the most comprehensive analysis of a very complex and large eruption that had far-reaching impacts across the Pacific Ocean and beyond. Our work involved a truly global scientific effort with 76 authors from 17 countries. The group’s expertise included seismology, acoustics, tsunamis, ionospheric perturbations, and volcanology.

Atmospheric pressure waves caused by the Hunga eruption varied in frequency from acoustic-gravity to audio range, and so there was a need for interdisciplinary collaboration and perspective. Similarly, the event was captured on a wide range of instrument types, each providing different information and constraints, further motivating the collaboration.

The 15 January 2022 Hunga eruption was the culmination of a period of eruptions that began a month earlier in December 2021. All of the eruptions leading up to the main explosive event were much smaller, and the impacts were confined to the area around the islands of Hunga-Tonga and Hunga Ha’apai, Tonga.

The main eruption was the largest recorded in the past few decades and the most comprehensively recorded by global monitoring stations - part of the reason for the high number of scientists involved in the paper.

Following the eruption, global pressure sensing instruments recorded a Lamb wave – an atmospheric gravity wave generated by large disturbances of the atmosphere, such as by volcanic eruptions or other human-made sources that temporarily change the natural flow of the atmosphere. Lamb waves travel horizontally, and so the wave circled the globe at least four times over the six days following the eruption. We have never been able to record such a wave in as much detail before, or for as long a time period. This pressure wave was exceptionally rare.

Adding to the rarity of the event, the interaction between the atmospheric pressure wave and the ocean contributed to the tsunami activity generated by the eruption, and aided tsunami waves to travel right around the Pacific Ocean and other bodies of water like the Caribbean and Mediterranean Seas. 

Last updated:  13 May 2022 12:35pm
Contact information
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.
Declared conflicts of interest Geoff is an author on this paper.
Anna Perttu, PhD candidate, Massey University

This Lamb wave signal was a once-in-a-century occurrence and a once in a career type of signal. We had to go back to the 1883 eruption of Krakatau to find a comparable signal and not just from a volcano. What is so amazing about that is the 1883 eruption of Krakatau volcano and the observation of the atmospheric signals in barographs at the time was what began the the field of volcano infrasound which I work in now.

Hunga volcano produced a variety of types of atmospheric pressure waves including the Lamb wave, infrasound (sound below human hearing), and even audible sound. This sound was heard in NZ and while the direct sound from the eruption wasn't heard in Alaska, the interactions of this variety of waves produced an audible signal there as well.

We measure the size of an eruption in a couple different ways, the traditional being through the eruptive volume. However, in terms of the atmospheric signals produced this eruption was larger than both the 1980 Mt St Helens (Lawetlat'la), and the 1991 Pinatubo eruption.

This work was a huge community effort with 76 of us from 17 countries and a variety of backgrounds coming together for an intense 1 month of analysis. This analysis brought up many questions and there are already several other projects that have been spawned from this collaboration. There will be years and years of work done on this eruption.

Last updated:  13 May 2022 12:23pm
Contact information
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.
Declared conflicts of interest Geoff is an author on this paper.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research AAAS, Web page
Journal/
conference:
Science
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: GNS Science, Massey University
Funder: Funding: National Science Foundation grant EAR-1847736 (RSM, HDO, RNL); Defense Threat Reduction Agency Nuclear Arms Control Technology program under contract HQ003421F0112 (DF, LT, AW, KMA); US Geological Survey Alaska Volcano Observatory (DF, MMH, JL, HF); US Geological Survey Hawaiian Volcano Observatory (ADJ); National Science Foundation grant EAR-1901614 (DF); National Science Foundation grant EAR-1952392 (AMI); U.S. Department of Energy by the LLNL under Contract Number DE-AC52- 07NA27344 (KK); Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (SK, LM, PV, AK, MOM); French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) under reference ANR-19-CE04-0003 and CNES for APR project UVTECGEOX (LR and EAM) and CNES APR project “RealDetect” (EA); JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 19K04034 (SW); JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 21K21353 (KN, SW, MI); Royal Society Grant Number IES\R2\202007 (SDA); Los Alamos National Laboratory award number 89233218CNA000001 (PB, JW); Projects PAPIIT-UNAMNI108219 and UCMEXUS-CONACYT (AAC); Strategic Science Investment Funding to GNS Science, New Zealand within the Hazards and Risk Management Programme (GK); Internal funding from Penn State College of Engineering (TG); NASA Earth Surface and Interior Program under Ben Phillips, under a grant to R. Kahn at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (KFM); UCMEXUS-CONACYT grant 699758 (GMP); Proyecto Generación de capacidades para la difusión de alertas tempranas y para el desarrollo de instrumentos de decisión ante las amenazas sísmicas y volcánicas dirigidos al Sistema Nacional de Gestión de Riesgos (MCR, CR); Basic Research Project of KIGAM GP2020-017 and GP2021- 006 (IC, IP); SAGE II – IDA Network Operations, #SU-19-1001-08-UCSD and IGPP/SIO/UCSD internal funding (CWE, RJM); DARPA Cooperative Agreement HR00112120003 (JBS, RS). This research was partly supported by the Earth Observatory of Singapore (EOS) via its funding from the National Research Foundation of Singapore and the Singapore Ministry of Education under the Research Centres of Excellence initiative. This work comprises EOS contribution number 432 (BT, DT, AP)
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.