EXPERT REACTION: Birds become night owls with light pollution

Publicly released:
Australia; New Zealand; International
Photo by Dr. Yogesh Namdev on Unsplash
Photo by Dr. Yogesh Namdev on Unsplash

Birds around the world are singing for nearly an hour longer on average due to light pollution, a global study finds. Researchers analysed millions of birdsong recordings, including some from Australia and New Zealand, covering more than 500 bird species that are active during daytime. They found that light pollution had a greater impact on birds with bigger eyes and those with open nests, as well as migratory birds and those with larger geographical ranges. Such birds were more likely to sing later into the evenings and earlier in the mornings as a result of light pollution.

Media release

From: AAAS

Light pollution is causing birds around the world to sing for longer each day, prolonging their vocalizations on average by 50 minutes, according to a new study by Brent Pease and Neil Gilbert. In their analysis of more than 500 diurnal bird species, they also note that birds that are more exposed to light – whether through large eyes or open nests – are the most affected by light pollution in this manner. Scientists know that light pollution, which impacts 23% of the planet, is influencing activity patterns governed by the circadian light-dark cycle in individual species. The new study is first to document this phenomenon in birds across species and space and seasons. It’s unclear whether these impacts are positive, negative, or neutral for the birds’ fitness, but “documenting these fitness effects and curbing light pollution are challenges for 21st-century conservation,” the authors write. Pease and Gilbert analyzed 2.6 million observations of onset (morning) bird vocalization and 1.8 million observations of
cessation (evening) bird calls. The data come from the BirdWeather project, which includes volunteer scientist recordings, automated biodiversity monitoring and machine learning. The researchers found limited evidence for the effects of habitat density, latitude and specific richness on light pollution’s interaction with vocalizations, but they note that their database remains too incomplete for some regions and species to definitively measure these effects.

Expert Reaction

These comments have been collated by the Science Media Centre to provide a variety of expert perspectives on this issue. Feel free to use these quotes in your stories. Views expressed are the personal opinions of the experts named. They do not represent the views of the SMC or any other organisation unless specifically stated.

Dr Bridgette Farnworth, Lecturer, School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, comments:

Artificial light at night is spreading rapidly across the globe. While it has transformed how we live after dark, it also disrupts wildlife in surprising ways. This new study by Pease and Gilbert shows that birds in brighter environments sing for nearly an hour longer than those in darker landscapes. 

"Back home in New Zealand, similar effects of light pollution are emerging for our birds. Tūī start singing later under LED streetlights, kiwi avoid illuminated areas, threatened banded dotterels are killed by predators using streetlighting to hunt, and Cook’s petrels are dying from internal injuries caused by crashing after being disorientated by light at night.

"These changes may seem small, but they carry real consequences. Pease and Gilbert do a great job considering how birds in their study might be affected and suggest that extra time spent singing could mean less time resting; a big challenge during the breeding season, when birds must sing to attract mates and raise chicks at the same time. 

"For New Zealand, we need to consider what any changes in behaviour mean for birds and other wildlife. The good news is that the solutions can be simple: before switching on a light, ask if it’s really needed. A small act that makes a big difference for the species that prefer life in the shadows.

Last updated:  20 Aug 2025 2:18pm
Contact information
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.
Declared conflicts of interest No conflicts of interest. Dr Farnworth is currently funded by Rutherford Fellowship to examine ecological impacts of light pollution.

Dr Rachael Shaw, Senior Lecturer in Behavioural Ecology, Victoria University of Wellington, comments:

In Aotearoa, we know that light pollution from fishing vessels and cities negatively impacts seabirds, causing injuries and fatalities when birds use these artificial light sources for navigation. This new study suggests that light pollution is in fact altering bird behaviour at a global scale, by keeping birds active for longer periods each day.

"This could mean that native birds living near well-lit towns and cities in New Zealand are starting their days earlier and getting to sleep later than their rural counterparts. These possible impacts warrant further attention and add to our growing list of concerns about the impacts of light pollution on wildlife.

Last updated:  20 Aug 2025 2:14pm
Contact information
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.
Declared conflicts of interest No conflicts of interest. Dr Farnworth is currently funded by Rutherford Fellowship to examine ecological impacts of light pollution.

Dr Natalie Forsdick, President of Birds New Zealand, comments: 

We are seeing increasing light pollution, not just in urban centres, but across the whole country, which is likely to have impacts on our birdlife like this study demonstrates. Light pollution may disrupt the natural daily patterns of birds in ways we don't yet know about, and there may be different impacts on native species like tūī compared with introduced birds like mynas. Experimental studies in New Zealand have shown a range of outcomes, from no effect, to increased night-time predation by black-backed gulls on threatened species like banded dotterels.

"One of the biggest concerns in New Zealand as the seabird capital of the world is impacts of light pollution on seabirds, where urban light pollution may be mistaken for moonlight by juvenile birds, attracting and disorientating species like Cook's petrel or Hutton's shearwaters. This can result in fall out, where birds crash land or collide with buildings, and may become injured or grounded.

"Reducing light pollution through limiting use of unnecessary artificial lighting, or converting to lighting types that have lower emittance can reduce the impacts on these seabirds, and other fauna.

Last updated:  20 Aug 2025 2:12pm
Contact information
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.
Declared conflicts of interest No conflicts of interest. Dr Farnworth is currently funded by Rutherford Fellowship to examine ecological impacts of light pollution.

Associate Professor Kristal Cain, Te Kura Mātauranga Koiora | School of Biological Sciences, Waipapa Taumata Rau | University of Auckland, comments:

In recent years there has been a tremendous amount of interest and concern about how the amount of light humans are pumping out is affecting the world around us. The problem has been that it is difficult to do the really big studies that are needed to understand which animal are getting affected the most, and why.  

"This paper used the bird song data collected by thousands of volunteers and measured when birds start singing in the morning and when they stop for the night. They found that in brighter areas – birds start singing early and keep going later into the night than in dark areas. Importantly, most of the bird song was collected in North America and Europe. We still need to do similar work in the rest of the world to see how widespread these patterns really are. The manu of Aotearoa are quite unique in many ways. Even more importantly, we need to know how this affects the birds’ survival and reproduction. 

"Some evidence says too much light stresses birds out and makes them more vulnerable to infection and disease – but the lack of sleep might also mean they have more or healthier babies. Importantly, all this artificial light is not good for us either. So, it’s good for everyone to limit light at night to only when it is necessary. There are lots of little things we can do as individuals and as communities to reduce the amount of light that animals experience at night. For example, closing your curtains can do wonders, make sure the lights are only on when needed, and are no brighter than needed. Communities can put shields on streetlights, so they don’t spill light everywhere, use warmer light colours, and plant trees to contain some of the light. Check out this webpage for information on more steps to take.
 

Last updated:  20 Aug 2025 2:09pm
Contact information
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.
Declared conflicts of interest No conflicts of interest. Dr Farnworth is currently funded by Rutherford Fellowship to examine ecological impacts of light pollution.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research AAAS, Web page URL will go live after the embargo lifts
Journal/
conference:
Science
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Southern Illinois University, Oklahoma State University (US)
Funder: This work was in part supported by the McIntire-Stennis Formula Grant through the National Institute of Food and Agriculture and McIntire-Stennis Formula Grant ILLZ 22-R002 (to B.S.P.)
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.