EXPERT REACTION: An mRNA vaccine for HIV could be effective and affordable

Publicly released:
International
HIV-1 Virus Particles Transmission electron micrograph of HIV-1 virus particles (colorized red) replicating from an HIV-infected H9 T-cell (blue). Image captured at the NIAID Integrated Research Facility (IRF) in Fort Detrick, Maryland. Credit: NIAID Photo by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases on Unsplash
HIV-1 Virus Particles Transmission electron micrograph of HIV-1 virus particles (colorized red) replicating from an HIV-infected H9 T-cell (blue). Image captured at the NIAID Integrated Research Facility (IRF) in Fort Detrick, Maryland. Credit: NIAID Photo by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases on Unsplash

Scientists have used mRNA technology to engineer new vaccines for HIV, which can produce potent immune responses to the virus in animals and human volunteers in Phase 1 clinical trials, according to international research. Using mRNA has allowed the researchers to bypass common obstacles with HIV vaccines, and is another step towards more effective and affordable vaccines for HIV.

Media release

From: AAAS

Bypassing the base: mRNA vaccines for HIV produce potent immune responses and show promise in humans

Science Translational Medicine

In a pair of new studies, researchers have applied mRNA technology to engineer new vaccines for HIV, which produced potent immune responses in animals and human volunteers. By using mRNA to bypass a common design obstacle with HIV vaccines, the experiments underscore the utility of this platform in the quest for more effective and affordable vaccines for HIV and other diseases. Current vaccine candidates for HIV are largely based on the HIV envelope (Env) trimer and require it to be soluble (or not bound to cells). However, this exposes the base of Env to antibodies, even though the base is normally embedded in the HIV virion and is hidden from immune cells. As a result, antibodies that target the Env base don’t protect against infection. Parham Ramezani-Rad and colleagues theorized they could solve this problem with mRNA technology, which also offers superior production speed and lower costs. They tested two vaccines: one that delivers a soluble form of a stabilized Env trimer, and a second that instead delivers a membrane-bound form of Env.

This second form can be produced directly in the vaccine recipient’s cells and is displayed on the membrane, thus shifting the immune system’s attention away from the Env base and towards the proper target. When tested in rabbits and macaques, the membrane-bound vaccine elicited stronger neutralizing antibodies and reduced off-target responses toward the Env base. In the second study, Katherine Parks and colleagues built on these findings and evaluated the safety and preliminary effects of three mRNA vaccines in a phase 1 clinical trial. The researchers enrolled 108 healthy volunteers and administered three immunizations of mRNA encoding either a soluble Env trimer or a membrane-anchored Env trimer. Overall, the volunteers tolerated the vaccines well, and there were no major adverse effects besides a higher-than-average incidence of hives (6.5%). The membrane-anchored trimer vaccine generated neutralizing antibodies in 80% of the vaccinees, while the soluble trimer vaccine generated the same antibody response in only 4% of recipients. “With demonstration of more favorable safety, mRNA-encoded membrane-anchored HIV envelope trimers represent a promising platform for HIV vaccine clinical development,” Parks et al. conclude.

Expert Reaction

These comments have been collated by the Science Media Centre to provide a variety of expert perspectives on this issue. Feel free to use these quotes in your stories. Views expressed are the personal opinions of the experts named. They do not represent the views of the SMC or any other organisation unless specifically stated.

Seth Cheetham is Director of the Australian mRNA Cancer Vaccine Centre and am Deputy Director of the BASE mRNA manufacture facility at the University of Queensland

This study marks significant progress in the global effort to develop a safe and effective HIV vaccine that prevents infection. While drugs for HIV treatment and prevention have transformed the lives of people living with HIV, an effective vaccine is still urgently needed.

mRNA, the technology behind many of the COVID-19 vaccines, dramatically speeds up the pace of vaccine development. This enables researchers to have more ‘shots on goal’, opening the door to tackling even the most complex viruses like HIV.

Researchers from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center tested a new type of HIV vaccine that uses a new approach. By displaying a part of the virus on the surface of cells, the immune system can recognise it. This teaches the body to create antibodies that can effectively block infection.

In the early-stage clinical trial, the results were encouraging: 80% of people who received this version of the vaccine produced antibodies that could block the virus in lab tests. That’s a big improvement compared to most earlier vaccine candidates, which were less targeted and rarely triggered these strong immune responses.

The vaccine also generated strong memory responses, meaning the body would be better prepared to fight off HIV even long after vaccination. While most adverse reactions were mild and treatable, several people experienced a skin reaction (urticaria). If these side effects can be reduced in next-generation versions and the results hold up in larger real-world studies in the community, mRNA vaccines could be a transformative tool in the fight against HIV.

Last updated:  30 Jul 2025 12:41pm
Contact information
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.
Declared conflicts of interest I have received research funding from Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Sartorius Stedim Australia, and Sanofi. I have received support for conference attendance, travel and accommodation from Moderna and Oxford Nanopore Technologies. BASE Facility is a member of the Alliance for mRNA medicines.
Journal/
conference:
Science Translational Medicine
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, USA
Funder: Funding for this study was provided by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the US National Institutes of Health through grants UM1 AI068614 and UM1 AI068635 (to the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center), UM1 AI068618 and UM1 AI069481 (to the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center) (to M.J.M.), UM1 AI069494 (University of Pittsburgh) (to S.A.R.), UM1 AI069534 and P30 AI045008 (University of Pennsylvania) (to I.F.), UM1 Al100663 (Scripps Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology and Immunogen Discovery) (to A.B.W., W.R.S., and M.J.M.), and UM1 AI144462 (Scripps Consortium for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Development) (to A.B.W, W.R.S., and M.J.M.); the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCA TS) of the US National Institutes of Health through grant UL1 TR001857 (University of Pittsburgh) (to S.A.R.); the Joel Meyers Endowed Chair (to M.J.M.); the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Collaboration for AIDS Vaccine Discovery (NAC INV-007522 and INV-008813 to W.R.S.); IAVI (support to D.S.L. and W.R.S.); the IAVI Neutralizing Antibody Center (NAC ) to W.R.S.; and Moderna (to S.H., B.L., C.R., K.W.C., and W.R.S.).
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.