After a heart attack in hospital, chances of survival drop rapidly as the duration of CPR increases

Publicly released:
International
CC-0. https://pixabay.com/photos/cpr-cardiopulmonary-resuscitation-5807848/
CC-0. https://pixabay.com/photos/cpr-cardiopulmonary-resuscitation-5807848/

Your chances of surviving while receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for a heart attack in hospital decline rapidly from 22% after one minute to less than 1% after 39 minutes, according to US scientists. They also found the chances of avoiding major brain damage decline from 15% after one minute of CPR to less than 1% after 32 minutes with no heartbeat. Even in hospital, only around 25% of patients survive a heart attack, so the researchers looked at outcomes for nearly 350,000 US adults who had a heart attack in hospital between 2000 and 2021. They hope their findings will help hospitals improve their CPR performance.

Media release

From: The BMJ

Researchers estimate survival chances during CPR for cardiac arrest 

New estimates may help guide decisions about how long to continue resuscitation

A person’s chance of surviving while receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for cardiac arrest in hospital declines rapidly from 22% after one minute to less than 1% after 39 minutes, finds a US study published by The BMJ today.

Similarly, the likelihood of leaving hospital with no major brain damage declines from 15% after one minute of CPR to less than 1% after 32 minutes with no heartbeat.

The researchers say the findings provide insights that may help guide hospital teams, patients and their families in deciding how long to continue resuscitation.

In-hospital cardiac arrest is a common and catastrophic medical emergency, with only around 25% of patients surviving to hospital discharge.

Studies have shown that a longer resuscitation time for patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest is linked to lower odds of survival, but experts have been unable to make specific recommendations on when to stop resuscitation.

To address this knowledge gap, researchers measured the effect of CPR duration (in minutes) on outcomes for 348,996 US adults (average age 67 years) who had an in-hospital cardiac arrest between 2000 and 2021.

CPR was defined as the interval between the start of chest compression and the first return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) or termination of resuscitation.

The main measures of interest were survival to hospital discharge and favorable functional outcome at hospital discharge, defined as a brain performance score of 1 (good cerebral performance) or 2 (moderate cerebral disability) on a 5-point scale.

After accounting for potentially influential factors such as age, sex, ethnicity, and a range of pre-existing conditions, the results show that of the 348,996 patients, 233,551 (67%) achieved return of spontaneous circulation with an average CPR duration of 7 minutes, whereas 115,445 (33%) did not achieve return of spontaneous circulation with an average CPR duration of 20 minutes. 

At one minute’s CPR duration, the probabilities of survival and favorable functional outcome among patients were 22% and 15%, respectively.

But as duration of CPR increased, the probabilities of survival and favorable functional outcome decreased to less than 1% for survival at 39 minutes and less than 1% for favorable functional outcome at 32 minutes.

These are observational findings and the researchers acknowledge that they relied on the assumption that any termination of resuscitation was appropriate. They also point out that collecting time variables during CPR is difficult and they were unable to account for severity of underlying conditions and quality of CPR or post-resuscitation care at each hospital.

However, they say this was a well designed study using the largest in-hospital cardiac arrest dataset in the world, making the findings pertinent for hospitals intending to improve their resuscitation performance.

As such they conclude: “The findings provide resuscitation teams, patients, and their surrogates with insights into the likelihood of favorable outcomes if patients pending the first return of spontaneous circulation continue to receive further cardiopulmonary resuscitation.”

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research The BMJ, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
The BMJ
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, USA
Funder: MO’s research time was supported by the American Heart Association (18CDA34110042), the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Foundation (RE2020-0000000114), and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (R21HL167166).
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.