Image by Look Up Look Down Photography on UnSplash
Image by Look Up Look Down Photography on UnSplash

A new framework for customised marine conservation in local contexts

Embargoed until: Publicly released:
Peer-reviewed: This work was reviewed and scrutinised by relevant independent experts.

A new framework developed by Sustainable Seas National Science Challenge will help communities customise marine conservation efforts to best suit their local contexts. The framework will not only help communities identify all the human activities impacting a particular ecosystem, but also understand how these interact with each other, and determine the best course of action to take. The researchers say taking a holistic approach is important because, for example, the accumulation of microplastics in estuaries makes those ecosystems more susceptible to the negative effects of nitrogen leaching, and the overall impact of these cumulative stressors will differ in each unique context. 

Journal/conference: Ecosystem Health and Sustainability

Link to research (DOI): 10.34133/ehs.0115

Organisation/s: Sustainable Seas National Science Challenge, University of Auckland, University of Waikato

Funder: This work was supported by the New Zealand National Science Challenge Sustainable Seas Project 1.1 (Ecological responses to cumulative effects) established by the Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Enterprise, New Zealand (C01X1901).

Media release

From: Sustainable Seas National Science Challenge

New ‘ecosystem footprint’ research to support the health of our coastal environments

Aotearoa's coastal marine ecosystems are struggling with the cumulative effects of multiple human activities and stressors that are leading to tipping points, ecological surprises, and irreversible ecosystem damage.

Each activity, the stressors it generates, and the adverse ecological effects of those stressors, leave a ‘footprint’ on the environment, and in many marine ecosystems, overlapping footprints create complex mosaics of cumulative effects. How ecosystems respond to cumulative effects is dependent on the resilience of ecosystem components to stressors and ecological and physical context (i.e. place-based) dependencies. These collectively determine the size and depth of a footprint.

Microplastics are a growing problem world-wide and provide an example of how a stressor can impact the size of an ecosystem footprint. When microplastics wash up into our estuaries, they accumulate in the sediments altering the oxygen production of microscopic plants and nutrient processing capacities of foundation species, such as shellfish and worms. This negatively impacts the capacity of the estuarine ecosystem to process and remove excess nitrogen meaning that the ecosystem footprint has increased even though nitrogen inputs from land have not.

As a result, the ecosystem’s resilience to additional nitrogen loading and other stressors declines becoming more susceptible to a tipping point. Every coastal ecosystem has a unique ecosystem response that reflects the scale and context of interrelated activities and associated stressors, such as microplastics or excess nutrients.

New research from Sustainable Seas National Science Challenge has developed an ‘ecosystem response footprint framework’ to help communities to manage their coastal ecosystems and prioritise ecological recovery. This framework can be used to inform policy and new guidelines for marine management.

“We cannot just base the way we manage marine environments on limit setting approaches because the same thing doesn’t happen everywhere at the same time,” says researcher Jasmine Low, based at the University of Auckland.

“For ecological recovery and resilience, we need a way of understanding all of the damage done to a particular marine ecosystem and the best management actions to take.”

The framework aims to help communities and environmental managers take a more holistic (ecosystem based) approach to managing cumulative effects and make effective marine management decisions, even where detailed knowledge or data is not available. Take, for example, a community who are working to restore shellfish populations in a local estuary. The new framework can be used by everyone – regional council, community members and iwi/hapū – to make informed decisions about the next best steps to take.

This includes identifying if the estuary is a viable location for shellfish recovery, and whether that recovery can naturally happen in a time frame acceptable to the local community. Or alternatively, if shellfish stocks from elsewhere need to be brought in and cultivated to reestablish lost populations.

By knowing where and when to take different environmental management actions, communities can actively reduce the risk of future degradation to coastal marine environments.

“To try and find a solution to this big problem we have had to go back to basics and focus on how the ecosystems respond rather than just focussing on stressor loads (how much pollution we put in and how much fish we take out),” explains Jasmine.

The next steps are to integrate these concepts into marine spatial planning, policy frameworks, resource consenting, assessments of cumulative effects, and risk assessment frameworks.

About the Sustainable Seas National Science Challenge
The vision of Sustainable Seas is for Aotearoa New Zealand to have healthy marine ecosystems that provide value for all New Zealanders. It brings together around 250 ecologists, biophysical scientists, social scientists, economists, and experts in mātauranga Māori and policy from across Aotearoa New Zealand. It is funded by MBIE and hosted by NIWA. www.sustainableseaschallenge.co.nz | Twitter | Facebook | Instagram | YouTube

Attachments:

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public

News for:

New Zealand

Media contact details for this story are only visible to registered journalists.