A little more greenery could save many lives

Publicly released:
International
Photo by Ethan on Unsplash
Photo by Ethan on Unsplash

Just a little more green space in the UK's deprived neighbourhoods could reduce preventable deaths by around 40%, according to a new study. Comparing amounts of green space like parks and woodlands to deprivation, researchers found green space was inequitably distributed in England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland - a trend also seen in Australia. The amount of green space was also associated with preventable deaths (avoidable with effective public and primary health interventions) in the most deprived urban areas, with a 1% increase in grasslands linked to around 40% fewer such deaths. While this is an observational study, the researchers say it shows increasing accessibility and quality as well as amounts of green space could be an important public health strategy.

Media release

From: BMJ Group

More green space linked to fewer preventable deaths in most deprived areas of UK

Provision lowest in most deprived neighbourhoods in 3 of the 4 UK nations
Green space investment might be key preventive public health strategy, say researchers 

The provision of just 1% more green space in the most deprived urban neighbourhoods in 3 out of the 4 UK nations may be linked to around 40% fewer preventable deaths in these areas, finds research published online in the Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

Green space is unequally distributed in England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland, with the lowest amounts in the most deprived areas, the findings show, prompting the researchers to suggest that green space investment might be an important public health strategy for tackling health inequalities.

Spending time in green space, such as grassland, woodland, and parks, is not only associated with lower rates of death and ill health, and improved wellbeing, but also with environmental benefits, note the researchers.

In Europe, access to green space tends to be poorer in areas of deprivation. But data on the distribution of these spaces in disadvantaged urban neighbourhoods across the UK isn’t known, they add.

The researchers therefore wanted to investigate inequalities in the distribution of green space in both urban and rural areas (for comparison); and the association between its availability and numbers of preventable deaths in urban neighbourhoods in all 4 UK nations, stratified by level of deprivation.

They drew on local authority data, national statistics, the Index of Multiple Deprivation, and national land survey data, to calculate: the percentage of green space in urban and rural areas; population size and density; deprivation levels; and deaths from preventable causes—those that could be avoided through effective public health and primary prevention interventions.

They included 6791 defined geographical areas in England; 410 in Wales; 1279 in Scotland; and 890 in Northern Ireland.

The average percentage of green space was highest in Wales (45%), followed by Northern Ireland (24%), England (21%), and Scotland (16%). In all 4 countries, the average percentage of total green space in urban areas was significantly lower than that of rural areas.

Of the 4 nations, only in Wales was green space distributed equitably across neighbourhoods with differing levels of deprivation in both urban and rural areas.

In the other 3, the amount of green space was significantly associated with the number of preventable deaths among the most deprived urban areas.

In England, every 1% increase in green space in a defined geographical area was associated with 37% fewer annual preventable deaths.

In Scotland and Northern Ireland, a 1% increase in green space in a defined geographical area was associated with 37% and 41% fewer preventable deaths, respectively, over a period of 5 years.

“With the known health benefits of green space, this discrepancy may help to explain the wide health inequalities in urban areas in which the poorest and most vulnerable are most impacted,” suggest the researchers.

This is an observational study, precluding firm conclusions to be drawn about causal factors, and the researchers point to various limitations to their findings. These include assumed social and financial homogeneity of the geographical areas studied and the use of ‘land cover’ rather than ‘land use’ data.

“The unequal distribution of [green space] in urban areas demonstrates the need to target interventions at more deprived urban areas. Studies have shown that [green space] brings about greater benefit to those of lower socioeconomic position than those who belong to the more privileged groups, particularly in mental health and social integration,” they add.

“Although the study results show the association between lower number of preventable deaths and higher percentage of [green space] area, investment should not solely focus on increasing the existence of [green space] but also on [its] accessibility and quality,” they caution.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research BMJ Group, Web page URL will go live after the embargo lifts
Journal/
conference:
Journal of Epidemiology and Publich Health
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Queen’s University Belfast, UK
Funder: The UK Prevention Research Partnership is funded by the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Health and Social Care Research and Development Division (Welsh Government), Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research, Natural Environment Research Council, Public Health Agency (Northern Ireland), The Health Foundation and Wellcome. This work was conducted by GroundsWell consortium which is an interdisciplinary consortium involving researchers, policy, implementers and communities. It is led by Queen’s University Belfast, University of Edinburgh and University of Liverpool in partnership with Cranfield University, University of Exeter, University of Glasgow, University of Lancaster and Liverpool John Moores University. We would like to acknowledge our partners including: Belfast, Edinburgh and Liverpool City Councils, Public Health Agencies of Scotland and Northern Ireland, Green space Scotland, Scottish Forestry, Edinburgh and Lothians Health Foundation, Department for Infrastructure Northern Ireland, Belfast Healthy Cities, Climate Northern Ireland, Health Data Research UK, Administrative Data Research Centre, NatureScot, Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool City Region Combined Authority, Liverpool Health Partners, NHS Liverpool Clinical Commissioning Group, the Scottish Government, Edinburgh Health and Social Care Partnership, HSC Research and Development Office Northern Ireland, EastSide Partnership, Ashton Centre, Regenerus, Sustrans, Cycling UK, CHANGES, The Mersey Forest, Translink, Anaeko, AECOM Ltd, The Paul Hogarth Company and Moai Digital Ltd. RM is funded by the MRC and CSO (MC_UU_00022/4, SPHSU19)
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.