Would you take financial advice from an AI? It might depend where you're from

Publicly released:
International
CC-0
CC-0

UK scientists investigated the willingness of people to take financial advice from an artificial intelligence (AI), and say the results differed between cultures. They gauged the appeal of robo-advisory services - automated investment platforms that provide investment advice without a human advisor - among 11,000 people in 11 countries, and found that different attitudes across cultures shaped differences in consumers’ likelihood of adopting robo-advisory services. The AI was quite popular in countries where people distrusted human advisors and felt they might be cheated, but in cultures that value social interaction highly, people were less keen on it, the researchers say.

Media release

From: Wiley-Blackwell

How Likely Are Consumers to Adopt Artificial Intelligence for Banking Advice?

A new study published in Economic Inquiry is the first to assess the willingness of consumers to adopt advisory services in the banking sector that are based on artificial intelligence (AI). Investigators examined whether the likelihood that consumers adopt AI in banking services depends on tastes for human interaction across different cultures.

The study focused on robo-advisory services, which are automated investment platforms that provide investment advice without the intervention of a human advisor. When investigators analyzed an ING Bank dataset encompassing 11,000 respondents from 11 countries, they found that different attitudes across cultures shape differences in local consumers’ likelihood of adopting robo-advisory services.

The analysis revealed that robo-advisory services may be adopted where they compensate for feelings of a lack of trust and reliability towards human advisors among consumers. Also, fear of being cheated had a strong influence in enhancing consumers’ preference to use AI. Places where social interaction is considered important did not welcome the AI novelty, even when controlling for all of the usual factors that determine the adoption of new technology.

“There is some special value that people place on human interaction in services, which an AI-based service simply cannot substitute. Even when using a classical economic model for the adoption of innovation, such as the model by eminent economist Arrow and co-authors (previously used for understanding the adoption of new medicines), we see that the value of human interaction shows a clear importance for the AI customer in the service sector,” said corresponding Annie Tubadji, PhD, of Swansea University. 

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Wiley-Blackwell, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
Economic Inquiry
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Swansea University, UK
Funder: No funding information provided. Dataset provided by ING Bank.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.