The true cost of child abuse on South Australia’s public hospital system

Publicly released:
Australia; International; SA
Shutterstock
Shutterstock

‘Intervene before harms escalate’ is the message from University of South Australia researchers as a new study reveals that South Australian public hospital costs for victims of child abuse and neglect now exceed $415 million* per year.

Media release

From: University of South Australia

‘Intervene before harms escalate’ is the message from University of South Australia researchers as a new study reveals that South Australian public hospital costs for victims of child abuse and neglect now exceed $415 million* per year.

The world-first research compared the use and cost of public hospital services for people with and without child protection system contact, finding that child abuse and neglect was associated with excess public hospital costs, and that individual costs increased with age and severity of abuse or neglect:

·       $338-$1771 extra per child aged 0-12 years

·       $650-$1307 extra per teenager aged 13-16 years

·       $1174-$2148 extra per young adult aged 18-24 years

·       $2242-$3015 extra per adult aged 25-31 years.

Over a year, these costs exceed $124 million for people from infancy to 31 years (equal to an 18 per cent cost penalty) on the South Australian public hospital system. Australia-wide the costs are estimated to exceed $3.8 billion.

UniSA Chair Health Economics & Social Policy, Professor Leonie Segal, says the study highlights the outlandish cost penalties of child abuse and neglect.

“Child abuse and neglect is a serious public health issue that affects every aspect of human functioning, especially health. But until now, the impact on hospital costs has been unknown,” Prof Segal says.

“Not only does this study expose the excess public hospital costs of child maltreatment, but more importantly, it shows the cost savings that could be made if funds were redirected to help prevent child abuse and neglect and stop the harm escalation.

“In South Australia, far less than one per cent (< ~0.2%, or around $1 in $500) of the health budget is allocated to the mental wellbeing of young children, yet this failure is fuelling huge downstream costs on our public hospitals, as well as a wide range of social and economic ills.”

In Australia, 293,585 children were the subject of a child protection notification in 2020-21, and 49,690 children with a substantiated case of abuse or neglect.

Prof Segal says that a well-resourced and well-designed suite of services could disrupt the accumulation of adversities.

“Rather than waiting for child abuse and neglect and costs to escalate, we need to redirect funds to early-in-life interventions – such as mother/baby programs and intensive early years education and care – as well as intensive family support services and family reunification for children in their middle years,” Prof Segal says.

“Importantly, all services working with highly traumatised and vulnerable families must be underpinned by compassion-based trauma-informed training, to ensure that fewer children are exposed to abuse or neglect, and healing can be offered to parents and children before harms escalate across the life course and across generations.

“Only by choosing to invest in distressed children and families will we limit the adversity they experience and help stop the horrific and intergenerational cycle of abuse.”

Notes for editors

·       *$415 million is based on data of people aged to 65 years (the equivalent costs for people aged to 31 years, as in this study, is $124 million in SA.

·       The study draws on more than 30 years of data (between 1986 and 2017) covering public hospital inpatient admissions, Emergency Department visits, child protection system contacts, birth registry and perinatal data.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Media Release University of South Australia, Web page
Journal/
conference:
Preventative Medicine
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: University of South Australia, Washington University
Funder: This research was supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [GNT1103439] (Chief Investigator A: Prof Segal), which was administered by the University of South Australia and provided salary support for Dr. Armfield and Dr. Gnanamanickam. The Australian NHMRC had no role in the design and conduct of the study, the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data, the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.