Why aren't we testing ourselves enough for colorectal cancer?

Publicly released:
International
Photo by Diana Polekhina on Unsplash
Photo by Diana Polekhina on Unsplash

People who react 'defensively' when invited to test themselves for colorectal cancer are less likely to take part in screening programs, according to international experts. The team surveyed about 300 people who chose not to take part in an at-home testing program about their decision-making and compared their answers to a group of people who did participate. They say those who didn't take part were more likely to respond in a way that indicates 'defensiveness'. This means they were likely to avoid or disengage with information about their cancer risk, accept cancer was a risk for others but believe their diet or lack of symptoms excused them, or argue against the evidence presented to them about cancer risk and testing. The researchers say health programs need to take into account the tendency of some to procrastinate or minimise their own need for cancer screening.

Media release

From: Wiley

 Defensive beliefs likely keep people from taking at-home stool tests that screen for colorectal cancer

To increase screening rates, strategies are needed to address these beliefs.

Colorectal cancer is one of the most treatable cancers, especially if it is detected early; however, many people do not undergo recommended screening, even despite the availability of at-home stool fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kits. New research published by Wiley online in CANCER, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Cancer Society, reveals that people who react defensively to the invitation to get screened are less likely to take part.

For the study, Nicholas Clarke, PhD, of Dublin City University in Ireland, surveyed individuals in Dublin who had been invited to participate in a FIT screening program in 2008–2012. Questionnaires were mailed in September 2015 to all individuals who were invited to participate (over two screening rounds) but had declined and a random sample of individuals who had participated. Following two reminders, questionnaires were completed by 1,988 people who participated in screening and 311 who did not.

Individuals who did not participate in FIT-based screening were more likely to provide responses indicating greater defensiveness. This was apparent for all questions related to the different domains of what is called defensive information processing (DIP). The four domains of DIP include:

·         attention avoidance (reducing risk awareness by avoidance),

·         blunting (active mental disengagement through avoidance and accepted denial),

·         suppression (acknowledging others’ risk but avoiding personal inferences through self-exemption beliefs), and

·         counter-argumentation (arguing against the evidence).

“People who react defensively to the invitation to colorectal cancer screening are less likely to take part, and this seems to be due to such misconceptions that having a healthy lifestyle or having regular bowel movements means that they do not need to be screened. Similarly, some people believe testing can be delayed while they wait for a ‘better’ test (even though the current test works very well) or wait until their other health concerns are under control,” explained Dr. Clarke. “Some people also react defensively because they believe cancer is always fatal, which is not true. All of these factors can result in people making a decision not to take the home-based screening test.”

Dr. Clarke noted that the study’s findings indicate that even well-designed health communication campaigns and proactive screening programs may be hindered by individuals’ defensive beliefs. “The measures used in this study could be used to help identify people who may need extra support to take part in colorectal cancer screening programs worldwide,” he said. “The results suggest that screening programs need strategies to decrease procrastination and address misconceptions about colorectal cancer and screening.”

He also stressed the importance of trying to make colorectal cancer screening something that everyone routinely does when they reach middle age.

An accompanying editorial by Beverly Beth Green MD, MPH of Kaiser Permanente Washington and Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute advocates for additional research to test different strategies, such as financial incentives, for decreasing DIP.

Journal/
conference:
CANCER
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Dublin City University, Ireland
Funder: Irish Cancer Society, Grant/Award Numbers: CRS11CLA, SCR20CLA Open access funding provided by IReL.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.