Vaping industry cites conflicted, less-scrutinised research in parliament submissions

Publicly released:
New Zealand
Photo by Samuel Ramos on Unsplash
Photo by Samuel Ramos on Unsplash

Researchers analysed more than 440 pieces of evidence presented to the New Zealand parliament in 2020 in submissions by health organisations and the vaping and tobacco industry. They found that peer reviewed publications made up 64% of the health organisations' evidence, and just 37% of the industry's. The authors also say it is "highly problematic" that 15% of the vaping industry's evidence had connections to the tobacco industry, as New Zealand has signed up to the WHO's tobacco control agreement, which requires the government to protect health policy from interference by the tobacco industry.

Media release

From: Lucy Hardie, study author, University of Auckland, comments:

“This research highlights the role of the tobacco industry in the discussion around e-cigarette regulation in New Zealand. Compared to the health sector, the e-cigarette industry drew more frequently upon evidence published outside of peer review, which is subject to less scientific scrutiny. Further, evidence cited by e-cigarette retailers and manufacturers was four times as likely to be associated with the tobacco industry. Studies suggest that research with a conflict of interest is likely to yield results more favourable to industry objectives than independent research. These findings reinforce that public health policy should be protected from the influence of the tobacco industry. Instead, policymakers should draw upon high quality, independent sources to inform evidence-based decisions.”

Expert Reaction

These comments have been collated by the Science Media Centre to provide a variety of expert perspectives on this issue. Feel free to use these quotes in your stories. Views expressed are the personal opinions of the experts named. They do not represent the views of the SMC or any other organisation unless specifically stated.

Jim Mann is Professor of Medicine and Human Nutrition at the University of Otago, and Director of the Healthier Lives National Science Challenge and Co-Director of the Edgar Diabetes and Obesity Research Centre.

"Based on past experience of the tobacco industry, and some people in the food industry, the results of this study are unsurprising. What it does show is that we need a formally constituted transparent  structure for policy making within government, because somebody has to assess the quality of the research that's being used in submissions to parliament.

"Vaping is a very difficult topic, because even amongst academics working in this field there are some aspects which remain controversial. It might sound trite to say, but policy around such an important public health issue needs to be based on hard evidence."

Last updated:  04 Oct 2022 12:39pm
Contact information
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.
Declared conflicts of interest None declared.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research , Web page
Journal/
conference:
PLOS One
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: University of Auckland, The University of Sydney
Funder: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.