US vaccine rollouts by age prevent twice as many white deaths as Black deaths

Publicly released:
International
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:People_queuing_for_Covid-19_vaccination_centre_srinakharinwirot_university_bangkok_thailand_june_2021.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:People_queuing_for_Covid-19_vaccination_centre_srinakharinwirot_university_bangkok_thailand_june_2021.jpg

Targeted vaccine plans prioritising residents of all ages in high-risk geographic areas may prevent more deaths than age-targeted plans, according to a US modelling study. It found that if a hypothetical rollout was prioritised only by age - using actual Covid-deaths data from 2020 - then nearly 67% of white Covid deaths would be prevented in California and Minnesota, compared with only 40% and 33% of Black deaths, in the two states respectively. The authors say both ethnic- and geographic-targeting would avert more deaths than prioritising by age alone.

Media release

From: AAAS

COVID-19 vaccination plans that target people of all ages in high-risk U.S. geographic areas may be more equitable and could prevent more deaths than vaccination plans based on age-related risk alone, according to a new modeling study.

This study analyzed how hypothetical vaccination plans could affect COVID-19 mortality and equity in California and Minnesota, 2 demographically divergent states. The analysis suggests that states should target all adults in highly specific geographic areas using tactics that would reach more vulnerable people, as well as more older residents, specifically. The findings, which may be applied to global vaccination strategies, indicate that a vaccination plan that accounts for risk based on geographic location would have a low direct opportunity cost, since it would require allocating only a small number of additional vaccines to high-risk geographies.

While U.S. guidelines for vaccine rollout issued by the CDC were consistent with evidence that COVID-19 mortality risk increases with age, the guidelines did not account for evidence that risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 is much higher for Black, Indigenous, and People of Color.

Elizabeth Wrigley-Field and colleagues first evaluated the effects of prioritizing vaccine rollout based on age alone in California and Minnesota using observed COVID-19 mortality data for 2020. They found that, while vaccinating all people age 75 and older would have prevented nearly two-thirds of white deaths in each state, this strategy alone would have prevented far fewer Black, Latino, and Asian and Asian-American deaths in both states.

Next, the researchers explored the effects of alternative vaccination strategies. They found that prioritizing vaccination for more vulnerable racial groups within each age bracket would better target high-risk individuals than age-based vaccination alone, but noted that there would be legal, political, and practical barriers to prioritizing based on race. Alternatively, further analyses suggested prioritizing vaccination based on geography, a potentially less controversial strategy, would improve equity and avert more deaths than prioritizing age alone.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research AAAS, Web page This paper will be available after the embargo lifts at this link
Journal/
conference:
Science Advances
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: University of Minnesota, Stanford University, Harvard University, University of California San Francisco, University of California, Berkeley (USA), and French Institute for Demographic Studies, France
Funder: This work is supported in part by the National Institutes of Health. E.W.-F., A.R.R., M.B., and D.V.R. are supported in part by the National Institute on Aging (E.W.-F. and D.V.R.: P30AG066613; A.R.R.: T32AG049663; M.B.: P30AG012839 and R03G058110). E.W.-F., D.V.R., and J.P.L. are supported in part by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2CHD041023). M.V.K. is supported in part by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (K99DA051534). In addition, E.W.-F. is supported by a Sustainable Development Goals Rapid Response Grant, a College of Liberal Arts Seed Grant, and, during initial data processing stages, was supported by the Fesler-Lampert Chair of Aging Studies at the University of Minnesota. This research also relied on data and research support from the NHGIS, which is supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01HD057929) and National Science Foundation (1825768). Last, we thank the Berkeley Workshop in Formal Demography [supported by the National Institutes of Health (R25HD083136, P30AG012839, and P2CHD073964)], which facilitated the initial connection between the California-based and Minnesota-based research teams. The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or NSF.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.