Search-and-rescue operations don't appear to drive Mediterranean migrant boat crossings

Publicly released:
International
Mstyslav Chernov/Unframe via Wikimedia Commons
Mstyslav Chernov/Unframe via Wikimedia Commons

The frequency of search-and-rescue operations to assist boats carrying migrants across the central Mediterranean Sea does not appear to affect the number of boats making the journey, according to international researchers. The team collated data on boat crossings between North Africa and Italy from 2011 to 2020 to investigate what influences the number of crossings. Despite previous claims more migrants cross when there are operations to rescue them, the researchers say there was no change in crossings when search and rescue operations were ongoing. However, increases in the Libyan Coast Guard intercepting and returning boats were linked to reduced crossings.

Media release

From: Springer Nature

Social science: Search-and-rescue operations did not appear to drive migrant crossing attempts in the central Mediterranean

Search-and-rescue operations of boats carrying migrants across the central Mediterranean Sea did not appear to affect the rate of crossing attempts between 2011 and 2020, according to a modelling study published in Scientific Reports. The findings appear to contradict previous claims that search-and-rescue operations led to an increase in crossing attempts and a higher risk of death for migrants.

The stretch of the Mediterranean Sea between North Africa and Italy is one of the routes most frequently used by migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers attempting to reach Europe by sea. Alejandra Rodríguez Sánchez and colleagues modelled changes in the number of attempted crossings across the central Mediterranean Sea between 2011 and 2020 using data on the number of crossing attempts, boats returned to Tunisia and Libya, and documented migrant deaths. Data was taken from the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (FRONTEX), the Tunisian and Libyan Coast Guards, the International Organisation for Migration and UNITED for Intercultural Action. The authors then performed simulations using their model to identify the factors that best predicted variations in the number of crossings observed during this period. The factors assessed included the number of state and private-led search-and-rescue operations, currency exchange rates, international commodity prices, unemployment rates, conflicts, violence, the flow of air traffic between African, Middle Eastern and European countries, and weather conditions.

The authors found that changes in the number of sea crossings did not appear to be driven by state-led and private-led search-and-rescue operations, indicating that they may not incentivise further crossing attempts. However, the number of border crossings did appear to be driven by some changes in conflict intensity, commodity prices and natural disasters, as well as weather conditions, currency exchanges and air traffic between North African and Middle Eastern countries and the EU. In contrast, increases in the involvement of the Libyan Coast Guard in intercepting and returning boats to Libya after 2017 appeared to drive a reduction in crossing attempts and may have deterred migration. While boat interceptions and returns may have reduced the number of crossing attempts, the authors note that this coincided with reports of a deterioration in the human rights situation of prospective migrants in Libya during boat interceptions and returns, as well as in detention centres.

Together, the findings indicate that migration across the central Mediterranean Sea between 2011 and 2020 may have been driven by factors such as conflict or economic or environmental conditions, rather than search-and-rescue operations. The authors suggest that future research is needed to investigate the potential impacts of search-and-rescue operations on the decision-making processes of individual migrants and the smugglers that coordinate crossing attempts.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Springer Nature, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
Scientific Reports
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: University of Potsdam, Germany
Funder: Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – Projektnummer 491466077.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.