Santa, it's time to phase out coal for naughty children

Publicly released:
International
Photo by drz on Unsplash
Photo by drz on Unsplash

It's time for Santa to end his practice of gifting naughty children with coal, argues a UK paediatrician and her two daughters as part of BMJ's Christmas edition. Young authors Lilac and Marigold argue “[coal] is a fossil fuel and so giving children [coal means] the adults are being the naughty ones.” The authors also argue a bit of naughtiness is good for the planet, citing Greta Thunberg's school strike for the climate. They say as today's children grapple with climate anxiety and the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, it's time to be kind to one another and spend Christmas doing good for the planet.

Media release

From: The BMJ

The BMJ

Externally peer reviewed? No
Evidence type: Opinion
Subjects: Children

Santa should phase out coal as punishment in Christmas stockings 

Coal for 'naughty' children damages children's health and the environment, argue experts

Father Christmas has long been doling out coal to children on the 'naughty list’, but with the climate emergency in mind, isn't it time to phase out this festive punishment? 

In the Christmas issue of The BMJ, paediatrician Tamsin Holland Brown, and her daughters Lilac and Marigold, make the environmental—and compassionate—case for ending this "outdated and potentially harmful" tradition.

The traditional practice of rewarding well-behaved children with gifts but leaving miscreant ones with coal in the festive season persists; lumps of coal are widely available from major online retailers, and the #coalforchristmas hashtag crops up on social media.

However, the authors point out that not only does the burning of this non-renewable fossil fuel exacerbate the climate crisis, but its impact on air quality can also be bad for children's health. "It would be good for goodness' sake if coal was left in the ground", they argue.

Receiving a lump of coal might also have a negative impact on kids' mental health, they suggest. 

As the covid-19 pandemic, war, cost of living crisis, and the climate emergency have already added to anxieties, the authors suggest fostering friendships, and connections between generations, "might combat anxiety" better than a lump of coal.

The authors also make the case for rewarding 'naughtiness', citing Greta Thunberg, the eco-activist who inspired millions of children to go on school strikes for climate. As Thunberg says, children "can't save the world by playing by the rules," so these children deserve to be on the nice—not naughty—list, suggest the authors.

So as alternatives to punitive coal, the authors suggest recycled/upcycled gifts, plant-based foods, walks and bike rides in nature, inspiring novels, or even a stick insect. 

While the co-authors Lilac and Marigold have admitted that they missed school to attend a climate march in 2019, they point out that "[coal] is a fossil fuel and so giving children [coal means] the adults are being the naughty ones." 

We need to "Be kind to the world," they conclude.

[Ends]

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research The BMJ, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
The BMJ
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Cambridgeshire Community Services, UK, Thriplow Primary School, UK
Funder: THB none declared. LHB and MHB felt strongly about coal being given as a present to children at Christmas. They missed school to attend a climate march in 2019. They contributed to the content, design, and structure of this article, defining matters of importance to children.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.