Saliva-based COVID-19 testing is as effective and cheaper than uncomfortable nasal swabs

Publicly released:
International
Raimond Spekking/Wikimedia Commons
Raimond Spekking/Wikimedia Commons

Saliva-based sampling for detecting COVID-19 is similarly sensitive and less costly than nasal swabs, according to a review of the available evidence by Canadian and Brazilian researchers. As well as being uncomfortable for the recipient, nasal swabs require a trained health care professional and extensive personal protective equipment (PPE), they say. 

Media release

From: American College of Physicians

Saliva sampling could be a similarly sensitive, less costly alternative to nasal swabs for COVID-19 testing

Nasopharyngeal swabs are the primary sampling method used for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), but they require a trained health care professional and extensive personal protective equipment. Saliva-based sampling for detecting SARS-CoV-2 has the potential to address many barriers associated with nasopharyngeal swabs. Authors from McGill University summarize evidence comparing the sensitivities for detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection between nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva samples. They found that saliva sampling to be a similarly sensitive and less costly alternative that could replace nasopharyngeal swabs for collection of clinical samples for SARS-CoV-2 testing

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research American College of Physicians, Web page
Journal/
conference:
Annals of Internal Medicine
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: McGill University, Canada
Funder: McGill Interdisciplinary Initiative in Infection and Immunity.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.