Possible alternative to using shark compound for vaccines

Publicly released:
International

Researchers have developed over 20 semi-synthetic versions of squalene – a compound traditionally derived from shark liver oil and used to enhance the immune response of certain vaccines. The team produced squalene alternatives using yeast, and compared their effectiveness in vaccines to shark squalene. They found several of the components produced were similar or better than shark squalene, which is promising given shark numbers around the world are declining rapidly. The team says many of these compounds could make promising alternatives; however further testing would be needed.

Media release

From: Springer Nature

Vaccines: Creating alternatives to shark compound for vaccines

The generation of over 20 semi-synthetic analogues of squalene — a compound traditionally derived from shark liver oil and used to enhance the immune response of certain vaccines — is reported in a study published in npj Vaccines. The findings raise the possibility of being able to sustainably source replacements for this compound.

Shark-derived squalene has been used in vaccine adjuvant formulations (substances that are used to increase the efficacy or potency of some vaccines) in influenza and COVID-19 vaccines and is a key component in vaccine candidates under clinical evaluation for diseases including tuberculosis and malaria. However, shark populations have been subject to overfishing, and the global abundance of oceanic sharks and rays has declined by 71% since 1970, which may lead to problems with the supply of squalene.

Christopher Fox and colleagues generated over 20 squalene analogues from yeast-produced β-farnesene and evaluate their activity as vaccine adjuvant components compared to shark squalene. The authors found that several of the compounds produced (including alcohols A, farnesene thermal dimers, diols B, ether 4, and ether 5) possessed similar or improved adjuvant activity properties compared to shark squalene. Fox and co-authors suggest that some of these compounds could make promising alternatives to the use of squalene; however, additional testing would be necessary to advance such compounds in vaccine products.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Springer Nature, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo lifts.
Journal/
conference:
npj Vaccines
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Advanced Health Institute, USA
Funder: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under grant R01AI135673. 100% of the total project costs at $4.1 million was financed with Federal money. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of NIH. The authors are grateful to Dr. Valerie Soza for editorial assistance.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.