Picture this: Snapping photos of our food could be good for us

Publicly released:
Australia; International; NSW; WA
Adobe Stock
Adobe Stock

New Curtin University research reveals taking pictures of food isn’t just content for our social media feeds, but could be the key to improving people’s diets.

Media release

From: Curtin University

New Curtin University research reveals taking pictures of food isn’t just content for our social media feeds, but could be the key to improving people’s diets.

Published in the prestigious American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, the feeding study saw researchers measure the weight of meals, which were then provided to participants over a day for breakfast, lunch and dinner.

Participants compared different technology-assisted methods to recall what they had eaten over the past 24 hours.

One method asked participants to take photos of their meals using the mobile Food Record app.

These photos were then analysed by a research dietitian.

The study found the accuracy of the nutritional intake was far higher for the group who had taken photos of what they ate, compared to participants who were asked to remember what they had eaten.

First author and PhD candidate Clare Whitton said this was the largest feeding study to use the mobile Food Record app and the findings could have a big impact on how we capture what the population is eating.

“Accurate, reliable data about what the population is eating is key to supporting people to optimise their health,” Ms Whitton said.

“People can struggle to remember what they have eaten, but this study shows dietary assessment can be accurate — particularly when you take the burden away from the person when you ask them to take a photo of what they ate.”

While the study saw the food photos analysed by experts, there is work underway to streamline the process.

The team is collaborating with Purdue University in the US to use artificial intelligence to automatically analyse the foods in the photos.

Study lead and mobile Food Record App co-creator Professor Deborah Kerr said this was an exciting development in getting the bigger picture of what people are eating.

“It makes it a lot simpler for people to track what they consume when they only have to take photos for the day,” Professor Kerr said.

“This will become even easier as we start to fully automate the analysis of the foods in the photos.

“With advances in AI technology this may be just around the corner.”

Professor Kerr said as technology advances, it could provide an avenue to not only better capture what populations are eating, but also offer more accurate dietary advice for individuals looking to eat healthier.

“This research shows the benefit of images; that's the pathway we're going down to get an accurate picture of what people are eating.”

‘Accuracy of energy and nutrient intake estimation versus observed intake using four technology-assisted dietary assessment methods: a randomized crossover feeding study’ was published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

Journal/
conference:
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Curtin University, Edith Cowan University, The University of Newcastle
Funder: This study was funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery Project 190101723 entitled “Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of technology-assisted dietary assessment.” ASA24, the Automated Self-Administered (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool, version 2016, was developed by the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. ASA24 is a registered trademark of HHS. In collaboration with the National Cancer Institute (NCI), a consortium of Australian researchers adapted ASA24 to the Australian context, led by The Institute for Nutrition and Physical Activity (IPAN) at Deakin University. Intake24 is an open-source web-based dietary assessment research tool based on the 24-h recall method, primarily designed for self-completion. Intake24 was created by Newcastle University (UK), funded by Food Standards, Scotland. The system is further developed and maintained through a collaboration between Cambridge University, Monash University, and Newcastle University (UK). The mobile Food Record app study was funded by NIH-NCI (1U01CA130784-01, 1U24CA268228-01) and NIH-NIDDK (1R01DK073711-01A1, 2R56DK073711-04). The term mobile Food Record (mFR) is a registered trademark. CW and JDH are supported by an Australian Research Training Programme scholarship. CEC is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Leadership (L3) Research Fellowship (APP2009340). The sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.