News release
From:
Parasitic nematodes (commonly known as roundworms) are a large, diverse and poorly studied group of disease-causing organisms that severely impact the health of humans and animals.
They infect almost a quarter of the global population and significantly impair child growth and development.
Diagnosing these parasites is challenging as many species look identical, meaning common identification techniques typically miss species.
A new publication in The Lancet Microbe by researchers from the University of Melbourne and the University of New South Wales details the development of a novel diagnostic test capable of detecting the entire parasitic nematode community from stool samples of humans and animals.
The authors have leveraged novel sequencing technology to develop this breakthrough test which will enhance our understanding of parasite diversity and improve ways through which parasitic worms can be controlled.
Parasitic nematodes which include different forms of roundworms, like hookworms, threadworms and whipworms infect approximately 1.5 billion people and have a disproportionately negative impact on children and women of childbearing age, particularly in low-to-middle income nations.
The high prevalence of these worms not only causes a significant disease burden on affected populations in the form of impaired growth and development, but also necessitates costly mass drug administration programs.
"These worms cause some of the most common Neglected Tropical Diseases which are a group of diseases that thrives in areas with limited access to clean water, sanitation, and healthcare but are preventable and treatable.
Recent investigations into human-infecting worms have revealed that their diversity is higher than previously thought, meaning that a test able to correctly detect and identify these nematodes is urgently needed to correctly address the diseases they cause." said Dr Vito Colella.
Animal health also suffers from these parasites which can cause weight loss, decreased fertility and even mortality.
This has a pronounced effect on the livestock industry, reducing the quality of animal products, leading to dramatic economic losses. For example, in Australia alone, one species of nematode, the Barber’s pole worm, causes over $436 million in losses to our sheep industry annually.
Our beloved pets may also suffer as cats and dogs infected with parasitic worms may become anaemic, lose weight and even die.
Importantly, some of these worms are transmitted from animals to humans (i.e. they are zoonotic), meaning that a test able to correctly identify these parasites can improve control outcomes.
Conventional methods for diagnosing these parasites typically rely on microscopy to detect eggs or larvae in faeces, however they have poor sensitivity, and many species look identical. Being able to tell different parasitic worms apart is crucial as different species’ effects on host health can vary dramatically.
More advanced molecular methods such as Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR, which detects the presence of worm DNA) can be effective for identifying parasitic nematode infections. However, these approaches can only identify a few species at once and they struggle to detect rare, unusual or new species, which are common in Neglected Tropical Disease-endemic areas.
A team of parasitologists in the Melbourne Veterinary School developed a new method that circumvents all the previous issues with worm detection by being able to identify the complete diversity of parasitic nematodes from stool samples of animals and humans through the detection of worms’ unique genetic signatures.
This breakthrough makes use of advanced genomic sequencing technology that is capable of accurately characterising all parasitic nematode species present, while also being small and portable, meaning it can be used in the field.
Being able to detect all worm species present in an infection is crucial as communities of these parasites can be complex (as many as 10 different species have been identified from the gut of a single animal) and the parasite composition affect the disease outcome and treatments required.
Crucially, the researchers compared the performance of their test to the most accurate gold standard method currently available for parasitic worm detection.
Lead author Dr Lucas Huggins said: “We were delighted to see that it has a comparable sensitivity and specificity to this standard. Few worm infections were missed, meaning that our new test could provide a viable alternative for parasite testing worldwide.”
The outcome
While developing and validating their test the team used it on stool samples from humans and dogs who are exposed to lots of parasitic worms and are known to have high burdens of infection.
“Through this validation we identified rare or novel parasite species that had been missed by all previous diagnostic methods used on these samples," said Dr Huggins.
"Our novel test also identified zoonotic species in over half of the human samples tested, highlighting the role dogs play in transmission of these worms to people."
Such findings are key to identifying treatment and control methods that can eliminate these parasites from a region.
'For example, many parasite control programs rely on giving anti-worm drugs to the human population, however if zoonotic parasites are present in local animals then these will be untreated and the human infections can rapidly bounce back.'
The research is an example of ‘One Health’, a concept that acknowledges the interconnectedness of the health of animals, humans and the environment. One Health brings researchers with different but complementary disciplines together with community organisations, governments and the public.
Next steps
The test makes use of the Oxford Nanopore Technologies sequencing platform - small and relatively cost-effective technology that can be taken into the field to analyse local parasitic nematode diversity and disease burden. The team will continue to explore how the test’s complete workflow can be made more portable and user-friendly for its use in low-resource contexts.
Additionally, the team hopes that other research groups around the world will use their method to provide further validation through tests on different host species and geographical locations to confirm its ability to function well in a variety of different contexts.