Need a hug? It could boost your health, even if you're hugging a robot

Publicly released:
International
CC-0. https://www.stockvault.net/photo/194553/hug
CC-0. https://www.stockvault.net/photo/194553/hug

Physical touch from both humans and animals reduces pain, feelings of depression, and anxiety in both adults and children, according to Dutch and German researchers. They brought together and re-analysed the data from 212 previous studies of touch, involving a total of 12,966 people. They found strong evidence of health benefits for adults who engaged in touch with other people, and even with objects, including robots and weighted blankets. But the mental health benefits were bigger when people were touched by another person, rather than an object, they say.  It seemed the type of touch didn't matter that much, with hugs and massages having similar benefits, although being touched on the head or face seemed to be more beneficial for health than being touched elsewhere. The authors say further research is required to confirm their findings and to investigate whether the beneficial effects of touch hold true across different cultures.

Media release

From: Springer Nature

Touch likely improves mental and physical health

Physical touch from both humans and animals can reduce pain, feelings of depression, and anxiety in adults and children, according to a systematic review and meta-analysis, published in Nature Human Behaviour. The research suggests that touch is beneficial across a large number of both physical and mental health outcomes — both for healthy individuals and those in a clinical setting — and for all ages.

Touch is of great importance to humans — it is the first sense to develop in newborns, and the most direct way in which we interact with the world. Although previous research has indicated that touch is beneficial in both physical and mental health domains, it has focused on specific health outcomes or has not considered the influence of other variables, such as the types of contact or who applies the contact.

Julian Packheiser and colleagues conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of a total of 212 studies, involving a total of 12,966 individuals, to explore the health benefits of touch. The authors found strong evidence of health benefits in adults that engaged in touch with other humans or objects (including robots and weighted blankets). However, larger benefits to mental health were found when humans touched other humans as opposed to touching an object. Likewise, Packheiser and colleagues did not observe differences in physical or mental health benefits in adults based on the type of touch (such as massage or hugging). This result was also seen in newborns.

The frequency of touch also seems to matter as more frequent interventions had more beneficial effects. Touch interventions were effective in improving the mental health of clinical and non-clinical populations alike. The authors also found improved health outcomes when the head (for example, the face or scalp) was touched as opposed to other body parts such as the torso, and that unidirectional touch had benefits over bidirectional touch.

The authors suggest that future research should explore the effectiveness of different touch interventions in large, controlled trials to ensure the robustness of these results. In addition, further research might examine whether touch interventions are equally effective across different cultures, as most of the current research stems from cultures from middle- and high-income countries.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Springer Nature, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
Nature Human Behaviour
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Ruhr University Bochum, Germany
Funder: J.P. was supported by the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina (LPDS 2021-05). H.H. was supported by the Marietta-Blau scholarship of the Austrian Agency for Education and Internationalisation (OeAD) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation, project ID 422744262 – TRR 289). C.K. received funding from OCENW.XL21.XL21.069 and V.G. from the European Research Council (ERC) under European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, grant ‘HelpUS’ (758703) and from the Dutch Research Council (NWO) grant OCENW.XL21.XL21.069.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.