Expert Reaction

EXPERT REACTION: Lowering 'bad cholesterol' below current targets has heart benefits

Publicly released:
International
Heart by Heikenwaelder Hugo, Austria Licensed under CC BY-SA 2_5 via Wikimedia Commons
Heart by Heikenwaelder Hugo, Austria Licensed under CC BY-SA 2_5 via Wikimedia Commons

People with already low levels of 'bad cholesterol' can benefit from lowering their levels further, below current targets, by taking statins and other drug therapy, according to US research. The study pooled the results of previous studies to look specifically at people with levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, so-called 'bad cholesterol', that were already below the current guidelines. They found when these people were given drugs to lower their cholesterol even further there was a reduction in major vascular events, without an increased risk of serious adverse events. An accompanying editorial suggests updating current guidelines.

Media release

From:

Expert Reaction

These comments have been collated by the Science Media Centre to provide a variety of expert perspectives on this issue. Feel free to use these quotes in your stories. Views expressed are the personal opinions of the experts named. They do not represent the views of the SMC or any other organisation unless specifically stated.

Dr David Sullivan is the Head of Chemical Pathology at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital in NSW

This analysis re-examines the therapeutic relationship between lower levels of harmful Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and protection against cardiovascular disease outcomes. It concentrates on patients with LDL cholesterol levels that were already low, prior to the intensification of treatment and it includes the effects of statins, non-statins and even a drug designed to boost protective High-density Lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL). The study found that the relationship between the absolute size of the reduction in LDL cholesterol and the relative protection against cardiovascular disease was remarkably similar to that which was found in patients with average or elevated cholesterol levels. They also showed that very low cholesterol levels were safe within the periods that were studied.

Blood-pressure and blood glucose lowering treatments have limitations because overly aggressive therapy will cause symptoms such as fainting or loss of consciousness. This analysis is very important because it suggests that there is no such threshold for LDL cholesterol-lowering treatment. The greatest benefit from further reducing already low LDL cholesterol levels will be seen in patients with the highest risk of cardiovascular disease, including those with peripheral vascular disease and those in whom arteries continue to narrow despite usual therapy.

The accompanying editorial points out that the new information that has been included in the study warrants revision of the 2013 American guidelines on lipid management. This need is even more pressing in Australia where the guidelines are considerably older.

Last updated:  01 Aug 2018 5:24pm
Contact information
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.
Declared conflicts of interest None declared.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research JAMA, Web page Please link to the article in online versions of your report (the URL will go live after the embargo ends).
Journal/
conference:
JAMA Cardiology
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Harvard Medical School, US
Funder: The TIMI Study Group has received grant support from Abbott Laboratories; Amgen; AstraZeneca; Critical Diagnostics; Daiichi-Sankyo; Eisai; Genzyme; Gilead; GlaxoSmithKline; Intarcia; Janssen Research and Development; Medicines Company; MedImmune; Merck; Novartis; Poxel; Pfizer; Roche Diagnostics; and Takeda. Dr Sabatine reports receiving honoraria for consulting from Alnylam; Amgen; AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; CVS Caremark; Dyrnamix; Esperion; Intarcia; Ionis; Janssen Research and Development; Medicines Company; MedImmune; Merck; MyoKardia; and Novartis. Dr Wiviott reports receiving consultant/advisory board fees from Angelmed, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Aegerion, Janssen, Merck, Arena, Xoma, Amgen, and ICON Clinical and Boston Clinical Research Institute. Dr Wiviott’s spouse is employed by Merck. Ms Murphy reports receiving consultant/advisory board fees from Amgen. Dr Giugliano reports receiving honoraria for continuing medical education activities from Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, and Merck; and consulting/advisory board fees from Amarin, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Lexicon, Bristol Myers Squibb, CVS Caremark, GlaxoSmithKline, and Pfizer.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.