Lifestyle advice to lower your cancer risk does appear to work

Publicly released:
International
Photo by Anna Pelzer on Unsplash
Photo by Anna Pelzer on Unsplash

Adhering to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research cancer prevention recommendations works, according to international researchers who say the closer people follow the recommendations, the less likely they are to get cancer. The researchers used data from nearly 100,000 UK Biobank study participants, using taking information on their diet, physical activity and body weight to give them a score for how well their lifestyle lined up with the cancer prevention recommendations, which include maintaining a healthy weight, exercising, and eating more wholegrains, fruit and vegetables and less highly processed foods, red meat and alcohol. Looking at the incidence of cancer among the cohort, they say the better the adherence score, the lower the cancer risk, with gallbladder, ovarian and liver cancer risks the most strongly reduced.

Media release

From: Springer Nature

Health: Greater adherence to lifestyle recommendations associated with lower cancer risk

Greater adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) cancer prevention recommendations — which encourage a healthy lifestyle — is associated with a lower risk of all cancers combined and some individual cancers such as breast cancer. The findings are published in BMC Medicine.

The 2018 WCRF/AICR cancer prevention recommendations aim to reduce the risk of cancer by encouraging individuals to maintain a healthy weight, be physically active, and eat a diet rich in wholegrains, vegetables, fruit, and beans, but low in highly processed foods, red and processed meat, sugar-sweetened drinks, and alcohol.

John Mathers and colleagues investigated the relationship between adherence to the WCRF/AICR recommendations and cancer risk by analysing UK Biobank data for 94,778 British adults, who were 56 years old on average. The researchers used self-reported dietary and physical activity data — in addition to participants’ body mass index and waist circumference measurements — to score participants’ adherence to the recommendations out of a maximum score of 7 points. They used cancer registry data to calculate the incidence of new cancers that developed over an average period of 8 years. They accounted for age, sex, socioeconomic deprivation, ethnicity, and smoking status in their analyses. The average recommendation adherence score was 3.8 points and 7,296 participants (8%) developed cancer during the study period.

The authors found that greater adherence to the WCRF/AICR recommendations was associated with a lower risk of all cancers combined, with each 1-point increase in recommendation adherence score associated with a 7% lower risk. Compared to those with an adherence scores of 3.5 points or less, those with a score of 4.5 points or above had a 16% lower risk of all cancers combined. They also found that each 1-point increase in adherence score was associated with a 10% lower risk of breast cancer, a 10% lower risk of colorectal cancer, an 18% lower risk of kidney cancer, a 16% lower risk of oesophageal cancer, a 22% lower risk of liver cancer, a 24% lower risk of ovarian cancer, and a 30% lower risk of gallbladder cancer. 

The findings support compliance with the WCRF/AICR recommendations for cancer prevention in the UK, however the authors note that the observational nature of their study does not allow for conclusions about a causal relationship between WCRF/AICR recommendation adherence and cancer risk. The authors add that further research is needed to investigate which recommendations may be driving the observed association between recommendation adherence and cancer risk. 

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Springer Nature, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
BMC Medicine
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Newcastle University, UK
Funder: This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under application ID 69371. We are very grateful to the UK Biobank study participants and research team. We are very grateful to Marissa Shams-White and Jill Reedy (National Cancer Institute, USA); Aurora Perez-Cornago (Oxford University, UK); Moniek van Zutphen, Ellen Kampman, and Renate Winkels (Wageningen University, The Netherlands); Giota Mitrou and Martin Wiseman (WCRF, UK); and Dora Romaguera (Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands, Spain) for their invaluable guidance on how best to operationalise the 2018 WCRF/AICR Score within the UK Biobank.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.