How NZ politicians used tobacco industry arguments after smokefree repeal

Publicly released:
New Zealand
PHOTO: Ulad Ramaneka/Unsplash
PHOTO: Ulad Ramaneka/Unsplash

New research finds that politicians justified the repeal of Aotearoa's smokefree generation laws using tobacco industry arguments, such as 'endgame' measures being prohibitionist and increasing illicit trade, even though there is weak evidence for these claims. The research team calls for stronger lobbying regulation. For example, they note that unlike Australia, New Zealand doesn’t have a register where third-party lobbyists have to share their details to a national database.

Media release

From:

Janet Hoek, Professor of Public Health, Co-Director ASPIRE Aotearoa, University of Otago, Wellington, and study lead author, comments:

"The coalition government's repeal of tobacco endgame measures ignored research evidence, expert opinion and public support; as a result, the repeal led to questions about the tobacco industry's influence on health policy. Aotearoa's regulation of lobbying is weak relative to other countries and we need measures that promote greater transparency, including a lobbyists' register and robust code of conduct. Given tobacco companies' long history of corporate duplicity, we should change current policies so tobacco companies, and groups with commercial interests in tobacco products, are no longer able to submit on proposed policies."
Journal/
conference:
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: University of Otago
Funder: This work was supported by Health Research Council of New Zealand [grant number 19/641]. Although we do not consider it a conflict of interest, we note that all authors are members of the ASPIRE Aotearoa Centre, a research collaboration whose work aims to inform and support realisation of the Smokefree 2025 goal. No author has ever received funding from the tobacco or nicotine product industries.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.