First-ever lighting industry recommendations for better wellbeing

Publicly released:
International
PHOTO: Patrick Tomasso/Unsplash
PHOTO: Patrick Tomasso/Unsplash

An international body of experts have published the first evidence-based, consensus recommendations on exactly how bright things should be during the day and night to support our internal clocks, restful sleep, and daytime alertness. These recommendations aim to provide guidance to the lighting and electronics industries to improve how we light our workplaces and homes. During the daytime, for example, the team says that natural daylight should be used in the first instance to meet the recommended levels of light exposure, while things should be kept as dark as possible when we sleep. The next step will be integrating these recommendations into formal lighting guidelines, which currently focus on visual requirements rather than effects on health and wellbeing.

News release

From: PLOS

The light we experience across our daily lives has a major influence on our body rhythms. Modern lifestyles, with 24-hour access to electric light and reduced exposure to natural daylight, can disrupt sleep and negatively impact health, well-being, and productivity. A new report publishing March 17th in the open access journal PLOS Biology addresses the issue of exactly how bright lighting should be during the day and in the evening to support healthy body rhythms, restful sleep, and daytime alertness.

Professors Timothy Brown from the University of Manchester, UK, and Kenneth Wright from the University of Colorado Boulder, US brought together an international body of leading scientific experts to agree the first evidence-based, consensus recommendations for healthy daytime, evening, and nighttime light exposure. These recommendations provide much needed guidance to the lighting and electronics industries to aid the design of healthier environments and to improve how we light our workplaces, public buildings, and homes. 

A key question tackled by the new report was how to properly measure the extent to which different types of lighting might influence our body rhythms and daily patterns of sleep and wakefulness. Light affects these patterns via a specialized type of cell in the eye that uses a light sensitive protein, melanopsin, that is distinct from the proteins in the rods and cones that support vision (and upon which traditional ways of measuring “brightness” are based). Since melanopsin is most sensitive to light in a specific part of the visual spectrum (blue-cyan light), the new recommendations used a newly-developed light measurement standard tailored to this unique property, melanopic equivalent daylight illuminance. Analysis of data across a range of laboratory and field studies proved that this new measurement approach could provide a reliable way of predicting the effects of light on human physiology and body rhythms and could therefore form the basis of widely applicable and meaningful recommendations.

An important next step will be integration of the recommendations into formal lighting guidelines, which currently focus on visual requirements rather than effects on health and well-being. Additionally, increasing sophistication in LED lighting technology and the availability of low-cost light sensors are expected to increase the ease with which individuals can optimize their personal light exposure to best support their own body rhythms in line with the new recommendations.

Brown adds, “These recommendations provide the first scientific consensus, quantitative, guidance for appropriate daily patterns of light exposure to support healthy body rhythms, nighttime sleep and daytime alertness. This now provides a clear framework to inform how we light any interior space ranging from workplaces, educational establishments and healthcare facilities to our own homes.”

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research PLOS, Web page URL after publication
Journal/
conference:
PLOS Biology
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: University of Manchester, UK; see paper for full list of author affiliations
Funder: See paper for full list of competing interests. Funding: The 2nd International Workshop on Circadian and Neurophysiological Photometry (2019) was funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (UK) grant BB/N014901/1 to TMB and RJL, with additional contributions from the University of Manchester Centre for Biological Timing and the Neuroscience and Mental Health Domain. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.