Extinction risk for a quarter of freshwater critters

Publicly released:
Australia; New Zealand; International; QLD
Credit: Jens Kipping
Credit: Jens Kipping

Almost a quarter of the worlds’ freshwater animals are at risk of extinction, according to a new study of over 23,000 fish, crustaceans, and insects. A large international team including Australian and NZ scientists classified the species’ extinction risks, finding 24% were ‘Vulnerable’ or worse—similar to the proportion of high-risk freshwater mammals, birds, amphibians, and reptiles. However, the two groups have different habitats and face different threats, with those in this study most threatened by pollution, dams and water extraction, land use change, and invasive species. The researchers say the needs of this group of animals should also be considered in freshwater management.

Media release

From: James Cook University

A global study of freshwater species has found nearly a quarter are threatened with extinction, with scientists calling for the findings to be used to help reduce the loss of freshwater biodiversity.

James Cook University’s Dr Michael Grant was a co-author of the study published in the journal Nature this week, which looked at how more than 23,000 freshwater species around the world are faring.

“It included 23,496 fishes, decapod crustaceans (such as crabs, crayfishes and shrimps) and odonates (such as dragon flies and damsel flies).

“Overall, 24% of these species are at high risk of extinction, with decapods having the highest percentage of species threatened - 30%, as compared to 26% for freshwater fishes and 16% for odonates,” said Dr Grant.

He said the most dangerous threats are pollution, dams, water extraction, agriculture and invasive species, with overharvesting also driving extinctions.

“Among the studied species, 54% of threatened species are considered to be affected by pollution, 39% by dams and water extraction, 37% by land use change and associated effects from agriculture and 28% by invasive species and disease,” said Dr Grant.

He said biodiversity is in decline globally with freshwater ecosystems being particularly affected, but assessments of freshwater fishes and invertebrates has received comparatively little investment, political will or attention, including from the mainstream conservation community.

“It seems like a case of out of sight, out of mind,” said Dr Grant.

He said the findings of the analysis could help to reduce the loss of freshwater biodiversity if they were integrated into conservation management and government policy.

“Given that around one-quarter of freshwater species are at high risk of extinction, we need to act quickly if we want to prevent further species declines and losses,” said Dr Grant.

Multimedia

Astyanax mexicanus fish
Astyanax mexicanus fish
Atlantic salmon Salmo salar adult female
Atlantic salmon Salmo salar adult female
Odonata Chlorocypha cyanifrons - male damselfly, Gabon
Odonata Chlorocypha cyanifrons - male damselfly, Gabon
Woodville Karst Cave Crayfish (Procambarus orcinus)
Woodville Karst Cave Crayfish (Procambarus orcinus)
Freshwater infographic 1
Freshwater infographic 1
Freshwater infographic 2
Freshwater infographic 2
Freshwater infographic 3
Freshwater infographic 3
Freshwater infographic 4
Freshwater infographic 4

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Springer Nature, Web page URL will go live after the embargo lifts
Journal/
conference:
Nature
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Western Australian Museum, James Cook University, University of Canberra, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Zoo and Aquarium Association Australasia, Auckland Zoo, Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory
Funder: We acknowledge funding and support for the global assessment efforts for freshwater fishes and odonates from Al-Farabi Kazakh National University; Asian Development Bank; Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment; Auckland Zoo; California Academy of Sciences; Câmara Municipal de Vila do Conde; Center for Species Survival, New Mexico BioPark Society; Comitato Italiano IUCN; Comité Français de l’UICN; Conservation International; Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund; Department of Fisheries, Malawi; Dirección General de Diversidad Biológica del Ministerio del Ambiente de Perú; Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Environment Agency Abu Dhabi; European Union; Federazione Italiana dei Parchi e delle Riserve Naturali (Federparchi); Fonds Pacifique; Global Center for Species Survival, Indianapolis Zoo; Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade; Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos von Humboldt; IBAT; International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation; IUCN; IUCN’s Bureau Regional de l’Afrique Centrale et Ouest; IUCN Moroccan National Committee; IUCN National Committee of the Netherlands; IUCN SSC; IUCN Tunisian National Committee; IUCN Water and Nature Initiative; John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation; JRS Biodiversity Foundation; Junta de Andalucia; Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, National University of Singapore; Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries; Mandai Wildlife Group; MAVA Foundation; Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare; Missouri Botanical Garden, Madagascar; Monash University; Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory; Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle; National Institute of Biological Resources; National Museums of Kenya; NatureServe; North of England Zoological Society; Office Pour les Insectes et leur Environnement; Pontificia Universidad Javeriana de Colombia; Research Centre for Biodiversity and Genetic Resources of Porto University; Rufford Foundation; Sapienza Università di Roma; Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum; Sociedade de Odonatología Latinoamericana; Société française d’Odonatologie; Society of Entrepreneurs and Ecology Foundation; South Africa Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity; South Africa National Biodiversity Institute; Spanish Agency for International Cooperation Development; Spanish Ministry of Environment; Synchronicity Earth; Tanzania Fisheries Research Institute; Toyota Motor Corporation through the IUCN-Toyota Red List Partnership; Uganda Coalition for Sustainable Development; Ugandan National Wetlands Programme; University of Burundi; University of Canberra; Universidad de Los Andes; Wetlands International; WildFish; WorldFish; Yayasan Bumi Sawerigading; Zoo Outreach Organisation; and Zoological Society of London. We acknowledge funding for this analysis and manuscript from the Regina Bauer Frankenberg Foundation; the Global Environment Facility (GEF); and the support of the IUCN GEF Project Agency. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN. The designation of geographical entities in this paper, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.