Experts warn of 'short term gain and long term pain' in public-private partnership hospitals

Publicly released:
New Zealand
Image via Hush Naidoo Jade Photography via UnSplash
Image via Hush Naidoo Jade Photography via UnSplash

Experts have warned that public-private partnerships for hospitals could result in unacceptable disparities in standards of care. In a NZMJ editorial, they write that while private, user-pays hospital systems can 'exist happily and productively' alongside public hospital systems, public-private partnerships can help governments shirk their responsibility to provide free and fair access to secondary healthcare for all. They cite recent experiences in the UK, Australia and Europe where public-private partnerships have resulted in a slow decline into prohibitively expensive US-style healthcare systems. 

Media release

From: Pasifika Medical Association Group

Public–private partnerships are used by some governments to build, and sometimes maintain and occasionally run, public hospitals. They can be superficially attractive, as they allow governments easier financial borrowing and access to business expertise. However, the short-term gains often come with long-term pains. The boundary between private business and government responsibilities for providing free, fair access to hospital healthcare become blurred. This has often led, in the UK, Australia, Europe and other places, to failed private hospitals closing or requiring government bailouts. It can also lead to a slow decline into a US-style private hospital system, which is prohibitively expensive and has an unacceptable disparity of standards of care between the haves and have-nots.

Journal/
conference:
New Zealand Medical Journal
Organisation/s: University of Otago
Funder: N/A
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.