Even a small nuclear war could lead to famine, but Australia might be the best place to be

Publicly released:
Australia; International; QLD
Credit:  International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, Flickr CC2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/
Credit: International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, Flickr CC2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/

If a nuclear war were to break out, it could result in famine in large parts of the world, according to Australian and international researchers. The study found that if a war broke out between India and Pakistan, it would produce more than 5 teragrams (5 trillion grams) of soot and that would cause mass food shortages in almost all countries, killing around 2 billion people. If the war was between the US and Russia, that would produce around 150 teragrams of soot, sending the world into a nuclear winter and resulting in the famine-related deaths of 5 billion people. The study found that Australia may be the best place in the world to be if nuclear war broke out, as our wheat production is predicted less affected and wheat makes up half of our calorie intake.

Media release

From: Springer Nature

Food: Modelling global famine and associated deaths from nuclear weapon detonation (N&V)

An analysis of the impacts arising from the detonation of nuclear weapons, and the resulting injection of soot into the atmosphere, on global food shortages and famine-related deaths in six scenarios is presented in a modelling study published in Nature Food.

Nuclear weapon detonation would cause massive fires and inject soot into the atmosphere, blocking sunlight from reaching the surface and limiting food production. The scale of the resulting food shortages will depend on the amount of cooling, and changes in precipitation and surface sunlight, which are determined by the amount of soot lofted into the upper atmosphere.

Lili Xia and colleagues modelled the impacts of six atmospheric soot-injection scenarios — based on the reported stocks of nuclear-armed nations — following one week of nuclear war on major crop and wild-caught marine fish supplies, along with other food and livestock production levels. The authors then used these data to estimate the global calorie supply after stored food supplies were depleted. Even with mitigation measures — such as food waste reduction and repurposing crops grown primarily as animal feed and for biofuel by redirecting them towards human consumption — the team predict that livestock and aquatic food production could not compensate for reduced crop output in most nations. Any nuclear weapon detonation that produces more than 5 teragrams (5 trillion grams) of soot is predicted to likely cause mass food shortages in almost all countries. The authors estimate that famine-induced deaths arising from a nuclear war between India and Pakistan could be in the region of 2.5 billion in the two years following the outbreak of war; for a nuclear conflict between the United States and Russia, famine-related deaths could reach 5 billion.

The authors conclude that these findings demonstrate the far-reaching implications of nuclear conflict for planetary and human health, as well as the importance of global cooperation in preventing the use of nuclear weapons.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Springer Nature, Web page Please link to the article in online versions of your report (the URL will go live after the embargo ends).
Journal/
conference:
Nature Food
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Rutgers University, USA
Funder: This study was supported by the Open Philanthropy Project, with partial support from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement 682602. A.R. and L.X. were supported by National Science Foundation grants AGS-2017113 and ENG-2028541. K.S. was supported by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement 682602 and Research Council of Norway project 326896. C.S.H., C.G.B. and O.B.T. were supported by the Open Philanthropy Project. J.J. was supported by the NASA GISS Climate Impacts Group and the Open Philanthropy Project. B.L.B. has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 776479 (COACCH) and 821010 (CASCADES). I.W. and B.L.B. have received funding from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in the context of the project ‘FOCUS–Food security and sustained coastal livelihoods through linking land and ocean’ (031B0787B). R.H. was supported by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement 682602. We thank I. Helfand for valuable suggestions on the work and D. Lombardozzi for supporting CLM5crop simulations.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.