Diabetes, weight-loss drugs not a perfect fit?

Publicly released:
Australia; SA
Shutterstock
Shutterstock

Type 2 diabetes affects millions of people worldwide and now a new international study, jointly led by Adelaide University, University of Oxford, ETH Zurich, and Stanford University, has found one in ten people may not be benefiting from common medications used to treat the condition.

News release

From: Adelaide University

Type 2 diabetes affects millions of people worldwide and now a new international study, jointly led by Adelaide University, University of Oxford, ETH Zurich, and Stanford University, has found one in ten people may not be benefiting from common medications used to treat the condition.

The collaborative study discovered genetic variations present in ten per cent of the population could prevent GLP-1 receptor medications, such as Ozempic, from working effectively.

The results highlight the need for more personalised approaches to prescribing these widely used medications, which are also used for weight-loss.

“In recent years there have been major improvements in the treatment of diabetes and obesity, driven by the widespread use of GLP-1 based medications, like Ozempic. However, not all patients respond well to these treatments,” said lead author Dr Mahesh Umapathysivam from Adelaide University’s Centre of Research Excellence: Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health.

“Understanding why and how to predict who will respond well or poorly will allow us to have the best chance to get the right medication to the right patient.”

The findings, published in the journal Genome Medicine, were the result of multiple human and animal trials investigating why two specific gene variants in the PAM gene increased the risk of type 2 diabetes.

It builds on previous studies which have shown the PAM gene increases the risk of type 2 diabetes by reducing the amount of insulin released from the pancreas and altering the structure of hormones, including the GLP-1 hormone which regulates blood sugar.

In this most recent study, researchers demonstrated that genetic variants of the PAM gene made the enzyme less effective, elevated natural GLP-1 levels while blocking the beneficial effects of the hormone on blood sugar levels. This suggests that people with PAM variants had some resistance to GLP-1.

Researchers then looked at how this affected the body’s response to GLP-1 medications. In people with the PAM genetic variants, the glucose lowering properties of the medications was reduced by up to 44 per cent at six months of use. Only 11 per cent of carriers of the more damaging PAM variant were able to achieve recommended glucose levels while on this type of medication, compared to approximately 25 per cent of people who didn’t have the gene variants.

“Our study is one of the first to provide in-depth, clinical evidence to show how people who carry specific gene variants are at greater risk of developing diabetes and also have a reduced response to GLP-1 receptor medication,” said Dr Umapathysivam.

“A likely development of this research is that, as other genetic variants that predict response to diabetes medication are found, we can combine this information to determine which diabetes medication will have the greatest chance of improving blood sugar levels and diabetes care for a patient.”

GLP-1-based medications like Ozempic are often injectable therapies that manage blood sugar levels by encouraging the pancreas to produce more insulin and control appetite.

“Type 2 diabetes is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite the availability of multiple glucose-lowering agents, only half of individuals with diabetes achieve the recommended blood glucose targets,” said Dr Umapathysivam.

“This indicates that although there have been major improvements in treatments, we still need to improve the care we offer patients and there is potential to achieve this with more personalised approaches to prescribing these widely used medications.”

Ongoing work into the study is being carried out with funding support from Diabetes Australia.

“Our hope is that this research will serve as a blueprint for future studies looking at genetic variants, eventually leading to the development of a genetic testing panel to identify the best medication for the patient, maximising the chance of good diabetes care and minimising the risk of adverse outcomes,” said Dr Umapathysivam.

Journal/
conference:
Genome Medicine
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Adelaide University
Funder: ALG was a Wellcome Senior Fellow in Basic Biomedical Science. MIM was a Wellcome Senior Investigator and NIHR Senior Investigator. ERP was a Wellcome New Investigator (102820/Z/13/Z). BH is supported by a Diabetes UK RD Lawrence Fellowship 19/0005965. RRH is an Emeritus National Institutes of Health Research Senior Investigator. This work was funded by the Wellcome (095101 [ALG], 200837 [ALG], 098381 [MIM], 106130 [ALG, MIM], 203141 (ALG, MIM], 203141 [MIM]), Medical Research Council (MR/L020149/1) [MIM, ALG, FK, ATH], European Union Horizon 2020 Programme (T2D Systems) [ALG, TH], and NIH (U01-DK105535; U01-DK085545) [MIM, ALG] and UM-1DK126185 [ALG], the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) [ALG, MIM, FK] and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (PJT-153156, PJT-185912) (CBV). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. The study was supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation (Grant number NNF18CC0034900). The study was supported by a grant by Boehringer Ingelheim (MS). The work was supported by a project grant from Diabetes Australia (Y24G-UMAM). The work leading to this publication has received support from the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking under grant agreement n°115317 (DIRECT), resources of which are composed of financial contribution from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) and EFPIA companies’ in-kind contribution. This publication is based on research using data from GSK (HARMONY trials) that has been made available through secured access. GSK has not contributed to or approved, and is not in any way responsible for, the contents of this publication. The ADDITION-PRO study was funded by an unrestricted grant from the European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes/Pfizer for Research into Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction in Patients with Diabetes (74550801), by the Danish Council for Strategic Research and by internal research and equipment funds from Steno Diabetes Center. This work was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and Innovation programme (Grant Agreement No 667191). AJ is supported by the Danish Council for Independent Research, European Union, FP7, Marie Curie Actions, IEF, Lundbeck Foundation (R140-2013-13313), Novo Nordisk Foundation and Danish Diabetes Academy (NNF17SA0031406, PDMI002-18). The PRIBA study was funded by a National Institute for Health and Care Research (U.K.) Doctoral Research Fellowship (DRF-2010-03-72, Jones) and supported by the National Institute for Health Research and Care Clinical Research Network. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. M.M.R would like to gratefully acknowledge funding from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant no. NNF21OC0070347) and a grant from EFSD/Lilly European Diabetes Research Programme. YCC is supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research REDI award. EXSCEL was conducted jointly by the Duke Clinical Research Institute and the University of Oxford Diabetes Trials Unit, in an academic collaboration with the sponsor Amylin Pharmaceuticals, a wholly-owned subsidiary of AstraZeneca.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.