Could ChatGPT help scientists with their research?

Publicly released:
International
Photo by Emiliano Vittoriosi on Unsplash
Photo by Emiliano Vittoriosi on Unsplash

Artificial intelligence programs like ChatGPT could be helpful to scientists if used wisely, according to international researchers. In an opinion piece, the researchers discuss the potential risks and benefits of software like ChatGPT, which they say could help researchers write papers more efficiently. They also note the software could help non-native English speakers with grammatical errors in their writing, which could reduce the risk of their findings not being published due to a language barrier. However, the researchers note ChatGPT does have a risk of repeating misinformation or even fabricating research entirely, meaning researchers will need to be smart about cross-checking anything the software comes up with.

Media release

From: American College of Physicians

AI software like ChatGPT provides benefits, poses risks for researchers and scientific publishing field
Abstract: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M23-0154
URL goes live when the embargo lifts
In a new ‘Ideas and Opinions,’ authors from Amsterdam University Medical Center outline the possible benefits, problems, and future of medical research assisted or written by artificial intelligence (AI) software applications like ChatGPT. The piece is published in Annals of Internal Medicine.

On 30 November 2022, a company called OpenAI released an online, AI-powered chatbot called ChatGPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) that simulates human conversation. Users will now be able to quickly summarize existing medical research findings, assist with medical decision making, and generate educational materials. This new technology may have significant implications for researchers, reviewers, and editors in scientific publishing.

In their piece, the authors argue that software like ChatGPT will allow researchers to create manuscripts more efficiently by assisting in generating complete, standard scientific text. They also highlight that this software may help nonnative English-speaking authors with grammatical errors, likely increasing their chances to have their findings published. However, the authors warn, the knowledge bases of software like ChatGPT are limited and users will need to cross-check information to ensure its accuracy. They note that pre-prints, existing misinformation, and ChatGPT’s tendency to generate nonexistent references while creating text may further complicate this process. The authors suggest that journals create policies for using ChatGPT transparently. They also advise that adding ChatGPT as a coauthor raises concerns because it cannot be responsible for its content and may not meet authorship criteria. Instead, authors could highlight areas of generated text that reviewers and editors can further scrutinize.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research American College of Physicians, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
Annals of Internal Medicine
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Funder: Authors have reported no disclosures of interest
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.