Corporations undermining independent science: The case of spinal cord stimulation

Publicly released:
Australia; NSW
Image by Gundula Vogel from Pixabay
Image by Gundula Vogel from Pixabay

Responses to recent research on spinal cord stimulation show how corporations continue to undermine independent science, according to Australian experts. One of the authors of this opinion piece was part of an independent Cochrane review looking at spinal cord stimulation to manage pain, and he shares his experience of the industry-led attacks he received. The authors say industry tactics include trying to control the debate, attacking the credibility of the researchers, emphasising 'real world studies", critiquing parts of the research rather than the whole, and exclusively citing research from industry-funded authors. They say one solution would be for the scientific community to simply stop accepting funding or publishing work from industry-funded researchers. 

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research JAMA, Web page Please link to the article in online versions of your report (the URL will go live after the embargo ends).
Journal/
conference:
JAMA Internal Medicine
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: The University of Sydney
Funder: Dr Bero is Senior Research Integrity Editor for Cochrane, for which the University of Colorado receives remuneration outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.