Are big birds actually bird brains?

Publicly released:
Australia; International
The task in situ with rhea R1 attempting to solve it. This can be found in the paper as Figure 3.  Credit: Clark
The task in situ with rhea R1 attempting to solve it. This can be found in the paper as Figure 3. Credit: Clark

Emus and rheas may be not be bird brains after all, according to international researchers who tested nine captive birds to assess their problem solving abilities. The team designed a puzzle to test several palaeognaths – a group of birds that have evolved flightlessness and gigantism, and also have smaller brains compared to other birds. The test required the three emus, two rheas, and four ostriches to line up holes in a plastic wheel to obtain a food reward. The birds were first shown a solved version of the puzzle with food freely available, then given 30 minutes to solve an unsolved version. All three emus solved the puzzle on the first try, and could solve it again once the puzzle was reset. One cheeky rhea also obtained the reward without solving the puzzle by dismantling the wheel to uncover all five food chambers – but on subsequent attempts was able to solve the puzzle as intended. Unfortunately, none of the ostriches were able to solve the task.

Media release

From: Springer Nature

Zoology: Big birds are not always bird-brained 

Emus and rheas may be capable of problem solving, suggests research on a captive population of nine birds published in Scientific Reports. The findings indicate that both species demonstrated multiple problem-solving approaches to a cognition puzzle through individual trial and error learning, showing an ability to innovate previously not associated with palaeognaths, an evolutionary branch of birds.

Palaeognathae is a small group of birds which includes several species that have evolved flightlessness and gigantism, such as emus, ostriches, and the now-extinct giant moa. Little is known about the cognitive abilities of palaeognaths, which have smaller relative brain sizes compared to other birds, as most research into bird cognition has focused on the problem-solving abilities of larger-brained species such as crows or parrots.

Fay Clark and colleagues designed a puzzle to test the problem-solving abilities of several zoo palaeognaths — three emus, two rheas, and four ostriches. The puzzle required the birds to line up holes in a plastic wheel held together by a nut and bolt to obtain a food reward. Each bird species was first shown a solved version of the puzzle with the food freely available, then given an unsolved puzzle to complete within 30 minutes. All three emus solved the puzzle on the first attempt and could solve it again once the puzzle was reset; one rhea obtained the reward without correctly solving the puzzle by dismantling it, loosening the bolt from the nut to uncover all five food chambers. However, on subsequent attempts the rhea solved the puzzle by spinning the wheel as intended. None of the ostriches were able to solve the task.

The authors note that some of the limitations of the study include the relatively simple puzzle design, and that larger-brained crows would likely have been able to solve the puzzle. The authors suggest that ostriches likely underperformed on account of their smaller relative brain size. As the behaviour of palaeognaths has been proposed as similar to some dinosaurs, Clark and co-authors also suggest that the ability to innovate may have evolved earlier than previously thought.

Multimedia

Image:
Image:

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Springer Nature, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo lifts.
Journal/
conference:
Scientific Reports
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: The University of Bristol, UK
Funder: No funding information provided.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.