Anti-inflammatory drug could help make the 'morning after pill' more effective at times of peak fertility

Publicly released:
International

Combining the morning-after pill, a drug called ulipristal acetate, with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) drug meloxicam, could make it more effective by helping to disrupt ovulation when conception risk is highest, according to US research. The authors say the combination is a promising candidate for testing as an on-demand contraceptive pill. The early-stage research, involving just 9 women, showed that ovulation was disrupted in 6 of the 9 women treated with the two drugs in the days just before ovulation when fertilisation of the egg is most likely to occur. Eight out of the nine women had some level of incomplete ovulation. The authors say the findings suggest that adding meloxicam to the morning-after pill may boost its effectiveness as emergency contraception.

Media release

From: The BMJ

New drug combo “promising candidate” for on-demand contraceptive pill 

Disrupts ovulation when pregnancy risk greatest, but further research warranted

A new combination of drugs has emerged as a “promising candidate” for an on-demand contraceptive pill, suggests preliminary research published online in the journal BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health.

The combination of ulipristal acetate, currently used as emergency contraception medication, plus the COX-2 inhibitor meloxicam, a type of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, seems to be highly effective at disrupting ovulation at the point in the cycle when the risk of pregnancy is greatest, known as peak fertility.

The days just before ovulation, known as the luteal surge, are when it’s hardest to disrupt ovulation and when fertilisation of the egg is most likely to occur.

Ulipristal acetate disrupts ovulation, but only if taken before the luteal surge begins. Drugs like COX-2 inhibitors, on the other hand, may still be able to disrupt ovulation even after the luteal surge has started.

The researchers therefore wanted to find out if the combination of both drugs might work at peak fertility, with the aim of identifying a lead candidate for a potentially highly effective on-demand contraceptive pill for use before or after sex as needed, or as an emergency contraceptive pill.

Ten healthy women between the ages of 18 and 35 were included in the study, all of whom had regular periods.

Each woman  was monitored through two menstrual cycles: a baseline cycle, to identify normal ovulatory patterns and a treatment cycle, when participants were given a combined dose of ulipristal acetate 30 mg and meloxicam 30 mg around the time of the luteal surge.

Ultrasound scans and key hormones were measured to identify the luteal surge and whether ovulation had occurred or been disrupted. Nine women completed both baseline and treatment cycles and were included in the final analysis.

Ovulation was disrupted in 6 women in the treatment cycle. Most (89%, 8) met some criteria for incomplete ovulation. Treatment cycles were around 3 days longer: this cycle length disruption is especially important for those who may also be using fertility awareness methods, explain the researchers.

This is exploratory research, involving just 9 women, so further studies on safety and effectiveness in larger numbers of women are needed, they emphasise.

But the results are promising, they suggest, because they show the combination of ulipristal acetate plus meloxicam can disrupt ovulation when conception risk is highest, making it “a promising candidate for evaluation as a pericoital oral contraceptive.”

They add: “When we compare ovulation disruption rates in our study with the previous studies on which our protocol is based, the combination of [ulipristal acetate] and meloxicam disrupted ovulation at each phase of the fertile window more than any other medication previously studied.”

The findings also suggest that adding meloxicam to ulipristal acetate may boost the latter’s effectiveness as emergency contraception, they say.

Notes for editors
The authors have previously posted a non-peer reviewed, unedited version of this study for feedback from the research community, on a recognised preprint server.

Some of the findings were presented at the Annual Fellowship in Family Planning Meeting in Boston, Massachusetts, May 2019 and at the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Annual Meeting in Philadelphia, October 2019.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research The BMJ, Web page Please link to the article in online versions of your report (the URL will go live after the embargo ends).
Journal/
conference:
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Stanford University, USA
Funder: This study was supported by the Society for Family Planning Research Fund (SFPRF18-01).
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.