Aggressive, bullying magpies aren't as smart as their victims

Publicly released:
Australia; NSW; WA
Image by Beverly Buckley from Pixabay
Image by Beverly Buckley from Pixabay

Australian magpies that get picked on by other magpies may be smarter than their bullies, according to Australian researchers. The team has monitored a population of suburban magpies in Western Australia since 2014, and from 2020 to 2021, they recorded data on the magpies' social networks to investigate how their interactions impacted their intelligence. The birds' brains were tested by approaching them with a colour-coded toy with a treat placed behind a specific colour, and seeing how quickly they learned to use the colour to find the treat before the toy was whisked away. Comparing the results of this test with the birds' behaviour, the researchers say magpies that bullied other magpies more often were less successful at the intelligence test, while those that were bullied were likely to do better. The victims may be smarter than the bullies because, lacking brawn, they need brains to get enough to eat, the researchers suggest.

Media release

From: The Royal Society

Fight smarter, not harder – Magpies on the receiving end of aggressive behaviour perform better in cognitive tests. Social interactions in a group of Western Australian magpies were monitored throughout the non-breeding season. Magpies subjected to more aggressive interactions performed better in an associative learning task, where individuals learnt to associate a colour with a food reward. These findings may support the ‘necessity drives innovation’ hypothesis, where individuals will invest more in finding solutions to new problems if they are unable to monopolise resources. Proceedings B

Aggressive interactions influence cognitive performance in Western Australian magpies

Sociality is considered a key factor behind the evolution of cognition. However, exactly which aspects of sociality are important remain unclear. We explored which social factors are related to cognitive performance in wild magpies. We measured social connectedness using multiple interaction types and quantified cognitive performance using an associative learning test. We found that social network measures were better predictors of cognition than group size. Specifically, individuals receiving aggressive interactions performed better, while those involved in aggressive interactions with more group members performed worse. Our findings emphasise the importance of considering social interactions beyond group size when exploring a sociality-cognition relationship.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research The Royal Society, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
Proceedings of the Royal Society B
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: The University of Western Australia, Macquarie University
Funder: EMS was supported by a Research Training Stipend Scholarship awarded by the Australian government, a Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment awarded by the Ecological Society of Australia, and an Ada Jackson Irwin Street Commemoration Award. ARR, BJA, and AT were supported by an Australian Research Council Discovery Project (DP200100566). BJA was also supported by an Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (DE220100096).
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.