A week after breast cancer surgery, it's time to get moving

Publicly released:
International
Photo by sydney Rae on Unsplash
Photo by sydney Rae on Unsplash

Beginning a structured exercise program a week after non-reconstructive breast cancer surgery could improve shoulder mobility and reduce pain a year on, according to international research. About 400 women undergoing the surgery were split into two groups; one was given standard care including a leaflet with current advice on returning to exercise, and the other was given a structured exercise program including stretching, strengthening and physical activity for three months. After a year, the women in the exercise group reported less pain and swelling and more mobility, as well as using fewer health services to manage common problems following the surgery.

Media release

From: The BMJ

The BMJ Externally peer reviewed? Yes Evidence type: Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation Subjects: Women

Exercise helps women with arm and shoulder problems after breast cancer surgery

Early post-operative exercise appears to help women recover better than receiving standard care only, study shows 

Women who exercise shortly after having non-reconstructive breast cancer surgery appear to regain better shoulder and arm mobility and experience less pain than those who receive standard care, suggests a study published by The BMJ today.

A team of researchers led by the University of Warwick believe the exercise programme starting just a week after surgery is clinically and cost effective because it seems to reduce upper limb disability one year after breast cancer surgery in women at higher risk of complications.

Shoulder and arm problems are common after breast cancer treatment, with up to one third of women experiencing restricted shoulder movement, chronic pain or swelling (lymphoedema) in the armpit area, which limits quality of life and delays recovery.

In the UK, guidelines recommend gradual reintroduction of exercise after non-reconstructive breast surgery, but there is a lack of good evidence about the ideal timing, intensity, safety or impact of postoperative muscle strengthening.

To address this uncertainty, the researchers conducted a trial to evaluate whether a structured exercise programme improved functional and health related quality of life compared with usual care for women at high risk of upper limb disability after breast cancer surgery.

Their findings are based on 392 women (average age 58 years) undergoing breast cancer surgery at 17 NHS cancer centres who were at risk of postoperative upper limb problems.

Women were randomised into two equal groups. Half received usual care (information leaflets) with structured exercise and the other half just received usual care.

The exercise programme, known as the Prevention of Shoulder Problems (PROSPER), was led by physiotherapists and included stretching, strengthening, physical activity, and behavioural change techniques. It was introduced 7-10 days after surgery, with two further appointments one and three months later.

One year after surgery, the women were asked to complete a detailed questionnaire and the researchers measured outcomes such as activity levels, pain, swelling, and quality of life.

The researchers also used hospital records to look at how often the women used health and personal social services.

Results gathered between January 2016 and July 2017 showed that upper limb function improved after exercise compared with usual care. 

At 12 months, women in the exercise group reported lower pain intensity, fewer arm disability symptoms, and better health related quality of life than those in the usual care group. No serious adverse events were reported. 

However, there were no differences in the rate of neuropathic (nerve) pain, wound-related complications, surgical site infection, swelling or other complications between the two different groups of women.

Exercise also proved to be cost effective. The exercise programme cost, on average, an additional £129 per patient. But when the researchers considered all healthcare and personal social services costs, there was an average saving of £387 per patient for the exercise group compared with the usual care group. 

The study had some limitations in that participants and physiotherapists knew which treatment they were receiving (unavoidably), and there was some loss of participants when following them up.

Nevertheless, the study’s strengths included a substantially larger sample size than previous trials, a long follow up period, and exercise delivered by NHS physiotherapists from 17 different cancer units in different locations across England.

The authors conclude: “We found robust evidence that early, structured, progressive exercise is safe and clinically effective for women at higher risk of developing shoulder and upper limb problems after non- reconstructive breast surgery.

The PROSPER exercise programme improved upper limb function one year after breast cancer surgery and was cost effective compared with usual NHS care. Our manualised exercise intervention is suitable for wider implementation in clinical practice.”

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research The BMJ, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
The BMJ
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: University of Warwick, UK
Funder: UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment Programme project 13/84/10. JB acknowledges support from NIHR Research Capability Funding via University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust. EW is supported by the National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration Oxford and Thames Valley at Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust. SP receives support as a NIHR senior investigator (NF-SI-0616-10103) and from the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Oxford and Thames Valley. The funders had no role in considering the study design or in the collection, analysis, interpretation of data, writing of the report, or decision to submit the article for publication. The corresponding author had full access to study data and had final responsibility to submit for publication.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.