A smallpox outbreak over 100 years ago shows vaccine refusal was tied to complacency even then

Publicly released:
International
Crown Film Unit, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Crown Film Unit, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Vaccine hesitancy isn’t a strictly modern phenomenon. Using records from two smallpox epidemics in Glasgow between 1900-1904, researchers found that people's past local experience of an infectious disease can impact their vaccination decisions. In areas where there were fewer deaths from smallpox, subsequent vaccine refusal was higher, indicating that complacency influenced vaccination decisions. The authors say the implication of this is that, in some areas, vaccine policy may be more effective if it takes previous local disease experience into account.

Media release

From: The Royal Society

Local infectious disease experience influences vaccine refusal rates: a natural experiment

Summary: Vaccine refusal has increased in recent years and this increase has been linked to complacency associated with reductions in disease risk. We study whether mortality during two smallpox epidemics in Glasgow between 1900 and 1904 mattered for later smallpox vaccine refusal following its legalisation in Scotland in 1907. We find that in small areas of Glasgow where mortality during the epidemics was lower, later vaccine refusal was higher. The finding suggests that complacency also influenced vaccination decisions in a period when infectious disease risk was higher than recently, responding to the local prior experience of the relevant disease.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research The Royal Society, Web page Please link to the article in online versions of your report (the URL will go live after the embargo ends).
Journal/
conference:
Proceedings of the Royal Society B
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: University of Glasgow, UK
Funder: R.M. is supported by The Leckie Fellowship, the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) Places and Health Programme (MC_UU_12017/10) and the Chief Scientist Office (CSO) (SPHSU10) at the MRC/ CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow. R.M. and K.A. acknowledge support from a grant funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) as part of UK Research and Innovation’s rapid response to COVID-19 (grant no. ES/V005898/1), from Erasmus+ and the College of Social Sciences Strategic Research Fund, University of Glasgow. G.S. is supported by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (ES/P000681/1).
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.