17th century mummified toddler was related to a Count and kept out of the sun

Publicly released:
International
Detail of the mummy: left hand on the abdomen. Credit: Nerlich et al, CC 4.0
Detail of the mummy: left hand on the abdomen. Credit: Nerlich et al, CC 4.0

The mummified body of a toddler from the 17th century has been identified as coming from an aristocratic family, the Counts of Starhemberg, yet he likely experienced extreme nutritional deficiency after being hidden away from sunlight. The researcher says the child, who is probably Reichard Wilhelm (1625-1626) most likely suffered from rickets, caused by a lack of Vitamin D, but as he was also overweight he was likely to have been very well fed, which suggests his vitamin-D deficiency came from a lack of sunlight. They also found he died aged 10-18 months from pneumonia, which is also more common in those suffering from rickets. The authors say in previous times socially highly ranked people avoided sunlight exposure, as Aristocrats were expected to have white skin, and this also applied to small infants.  

Media release

From:

‘Virtual autopsy’ identifies a 17th century mummified toddler hidden from the sun

[Summary] Scientists used a ‘virtual autopsy’ to examine the mummy of a child found in an aristocratic family crypt, revealing him most probably as Reichard Wilhelm (1625-1626). Despite his wealthy background, the child experienced extreme nutritional deficiency and a tragically early death from pneumonia. 

[Main text] A team of scientists based in Germany have examined a 17th century child mummy, using cutting-edge science alongside historical records to shed new light on Renaissance childhood. The child was found in an aristocratic Austrian family crypt, where the conditions allowed for natural mummification, preserving soft tissue that contained critical information about his life and death. Curiously, this was the only unidentified body in the crypt, buried in an unmarked wooden coffin instead of the elaborate metal coffins reserved for the other members of the family buried there. 

The team, led by Dr Andreas Nerlich of the Academic Clinic Munich-Bogenhausen, carried out a virtual autopsy and radiocarbon testing, and examined family records and key material clues from the burial, to try to understand who the child was and what his short life looked like. “This is only one case,” said Nerlich, lead author of the paper published today in Frontiers in Medicine, “but as we know that the early infant death rates generally were very high at that time, our observations may have considerable impact in the over-all life reconstruction of infants even in higher social classes.”

Well fed, but not well nourished

The virtual autopsy was carried out through CT scanning. Nerlich and his team measured bone lengths and looked at tooth eruption and the formation of long bones to determine that the child was approximately a year old when he died. The soft tissue showed that the child was a boy and overweight for his age, so his parents were able to feed him well – but the bones told a different story. 

The child’s ribs had become malformed in the pattern called a rachitic rosary, which is usually seen in severe rickets or scurvy. Although he received enough food to put on weight, he was still malnourished. While the typical bowing of the bones seen in rickets was absent, this may have been because he did not walk or crawl. 

Since the virtual autopsy revealed that he had inflammation of the lungs characteristic of pneumonia, and children with rickets are more vulnerable to pneumonia, this nutritional deficiency may even have contributed to his early death.

“The combination of obesity along with a severe vitamin-deficiency can only be explained by a generally ‘good’ nutritional status along with an almost complete lack of sunlight exposure,” said Nerlich. “We have to reconsider the living conditions of high aristocratic infants of previous populations.”

The son of a powerful count

However, although Nerlich and his team had established a probable cause of death, the question of the child’s identity remained. Deformation of his skull suggested that his simple wooden coffin wasn’t quite large enough for the child. However, specialist examination of his clothing showed that he had been buried in a long, hooded coat made of expensive silk. 

He was also buried in a crypt exclusively reserved for the powerful Counts of Starhemberg, who buried their title-holders — mostly first-born sons — and their wives there. This meant that the child was most likely a first-born son of a Count of Starhemberg. Radiocarbon dating of a skin sample suggested he was buried between 1550-1635 CE, while historical records of the crypt’s management indicated that his burial probably took place after the crypt’s renovation around 1600 CE. He was the only infant buried in the crypt.

“We have no data on the fate of other infants of the family,” Nerlich said, regarding the unique burial. “According to our data, the infant was most probably [the count’s] first-born son after erection of the family crypt, so special care may have been applied.”

This meant that there was only one likely candidate for the little boy in the silk coat: Reichard Wilhelm, whose grieving family buried him alongside his grandfather and namesake Reichard von Starhemberg. 

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Frontiers, Web page Please link to the article in online versions of your report (the URL will go live after the embargo ends).
Journal/
conference:
Frontiers in Medicine
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Academic Clinic Munich-Bogenhausen, Germany
Funder: No funding
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.