NASA/ESA/IA/CHFF Team, STScl
NASA/ESA/IA/CHFF Team, STScl

Universe expanding too fast - is it dark radiation?

Embargoed until: Publicly released:

The Universe is expanding faster than expected, possibly caused by an undiscovered force called dark radiation, a study involving The Australian National University (ANU) has found.

Journal/conference: Astrophysical Journal (Institute Of Physics)

Organisation/s: The Australian National University

Media Release

From: The Australian National University

The Universe is expanding faster than expected, a study involving The Australian National University (ANU) has found.

Lead Australian researcher and ANU astrophysicist Dr Brad Tucker said the precision study of star movements found the Universe is currently expanding between five per cent and nine per cent faster than early in its life.

“A funny universe just got funnier,” said Dr Tucker from the ANU Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics.

“We thought we were close to understanding dark energy, but now we know we don’t know the answer at all. There’s a lot of work to do.”

Cosmologists have realised in recent decades that normal matter such as stars, planets and gas constitutes only five per cent of the Universe. The rest is 25 per cent dark matter and 70 per cent dark energy, both of which are invisible and have never been directly detected.

Precise values of the Universe’s expansion from 13.8 billion years ago have been calculated from observations of the cosmic microwave background, the very faint afterglow of the big bang.

The research was led by Nobel Laureate Adam Riess of the Space Telescope Science Institute and The Johns Hopkins University in the United States.

The research team used the Hubble Space telescope to look at variable stars, called Cepheids, and Type Ia supernovae, which both have well known brightness that enables their distance to be precisely determined.

Using the parallax shift between objects of different distances as the Hubble moved – around the Earth on a daily basis, around the Sun on a yearly basis, and from tiny vibrations onboard the satellite – the team measured the movements of about 2,400 Cepheid stars and about 300 Type Ia supernovae over two and a half years.

From these measurements they calculated the Universe’s expansion rate, known as the Hubble constant, to be 73.2 kilometers per second per megaparsec (a megaparsec equals 3.26 million light-years) with an uncertainty of only 2.4 per cent. The new value means the distance between cosmic objects will double in another 9.8 billion years.

The research will published in the Astrophysical Journal and is available from Arxiv preprint server.

The team proposed a number of possible explanations for the Universe’s excessive speed.

One possibility is that dark energy, already known to be accelerating the universe, may be shoving galaxies away from each other with growing strength, termed phantom dark energy.

Another idea is that the cosmos contained a new subatomic particle in its early history that traveled close to the speed of light and affected the expansion rate. Such speedy particles are collectively referred to as dark radiation and include previously known particles like neutrinos.

The boost in acceleration could also mean that dark matter possesses some weird, unexpected characteristics. Or the speedier Universe may be telling astronomers that Einstein’s theory of gravity is incomplete.

“Perhaps it also could be something wrong with our assumption that Type Ia supernovae and Cepheids are standard candles. All options need to be looked at,” Dr Tucker said.

“Future studies using different techniques, such as the TAIPAN survey being led out of Siding Spring Observatory, will hopefully shed light on exactly what is going on.”

Expert Reaction

These comments have been collated by the Science Media Centre to provide a variety of expert perspectives on this issue. Feel free to use these quotes in your stories. Views expressed are the personal opinions of the experts named. They do not represent the views of the SMC or any other organisation unless specifically stated.

Professor Alan Duffy is Director of the Space Technology and Industry Institute, Swinburne University of Technology

This is a stunning example of precision astronomy. 

To measure how fast the universe is expanding you need to know how fast distant objects are moving away, and how far away they are. In astronomy we can use the stretching of light waves to longer wavelengths (seen as reddening of the light) to measure the speed of the expansion, but we can’t travel to these objects to measure their distance from us with a ruler.

The idea is to build up a distance ‘ladder’ of objects each of which we can calculate how far away they are from us, and use these to overlap to evermore distant objects until you can measure the distance like a ruler to the further objects.

Key to this is parallax, you can try this yourself by holding your thumb out at arms length in front of your face and looking at it with one eye closed, and then swapping eyes. Your thumb appears to jump in position relative to the wall behind. The closer your thumb is to you the bigger this apparent jump in position is.

The incredible Hubble Space Telescope was used at two different times (so it was at a different place, equivalent to your looking with different eyes) at special stars known as Cepheid Variables to measure their distance with great accuracy using this parallax technique. 

It was discovered by famed astronomer Henrietta Leavitt that Cepheid Variables brighten and fade regularly like  a ticking clock, with the time between ticks longer the brighter the star is. So if you time how long it takes between brightening and fading then you know how bright it should be and just like a candle is dimmer the further away it is  from you, we can measure how far away these must be depending on how faint they appear.

This work was able to combine both parallax and Cepheid Variable ‘standard candle’ techniques to more accurately determine any errors in previous works and get a more accurate distance ladder.

There were four independent distance techniques used to accurately measure how far these distant objects are from us, and then through the reddening of the light (redshift) we could measure the speed they were moving away from us, to  give an overall rate for how fast the universe is expanding, known as the Hubble constant.

This work found that the measurements from objects nearby versus techniques looking at the afterglow of the Big Bang are curiously different. The measurements from the afterglow (known as the Cosmic Microwave Background) are slower than what this team sees nearby, one solution is that there may be a type of dark radiation (a new type of particle species known as a neutrino) that could resolve this apparent difference.

An extra neutrino would be incredible, but claims of this level require extraordinary proof and what we have so far is tantalising but far from proven. 

It could also be something strange with dark energy itself which would be fitting as this is what Adam Riess shared a Nobel Prize for discovering  with Brian Schmidt (the new VC of ANU) and Saul Perlmutter!

The precision of measurements by the Planck satellite of the afterglow of the Big Bang is such that I’m afraid I’d look for issues with the messy objects used in this work, even though they were seen with the wonderful Hubble Space Telescope.

Last updated: 03 Nov 2016 7:44pm
Jeremy Mould is a professor at Swinburne University's Centre for Astrophysics & Supercomputing

One of the key goals of the Hubble Space Telescope when it was launched in 1990 was to measure the Hubble Constant and the age of the universe to 10% accuracy.

The first results were found by my team in 1999. This paper is the latest in the continuation of this work and announces a measurement of the Hubble constant to 2.4% accuracy, which is great.

But we should be sceptical about comparisons of this result with Planck's wonderful results from the cosmic microwave background. The Planck folks have found support for the standard model of particle physics with 3 kinds of neutrino.

Concluding that there's a 4th such relativistic particle is an extraordinary result which requires an extraordinary standard of proof. It's not there yet in my opinion. But the work is ongoing. It can only get better, as long as the Hubble survives.

Last updated: 03 Nov 2016 4:35pm

News for:

Australia
ACT

Multimedia:

  • Brad tucker
    Brad tucker

    Brad tucker

    File size: 56.4 KB

    Attribution: Stuart Hay, ANU

    Permission category: Free to share or modify (must credit)

    Last modified: 03 Nov 2016 6:04pm

    NOTE: High resolution files can only be downloaded here by registered journalists who are logged in.

Show less
Show more

Media contact details for this story are only visible to registered journalists.