iStock
iStock

RETRACTED: Most fish oil supplements don't contain dose claimed on the packet

Embargoed until: Publicly released:

[This study has been retracted by the authors. A corrected version has been republished.] The majority of fish oil supplements available in New Zealand are not true to label as most don't contain the dose they promise, undercutting any potential health benefits according to researchers from the University of Canterbury. Only two-fifths of the supplements tested had the same amount of omega-3 fatty acid content listed on the packet, and the remaining supplements had between 50–90 per cent of the labelled amount. Only one product was true to label, and while the others may not confer a health benefit, they do appear to be safe to consume as the researchers found no sign of mercury in the samples.

Journal/conference: New Zealand Medical Journal

Organisation/s: University of Canterbury

Media Release

From: New Zealand Medical Association (NZMA)

Statement from the journal:

The NZMJ retracts the following article. 

Are over-the-counter fish oil supplements safe, effective and accurate with labelling? Analysis of 10 New Zealand fish oil supplements Julia J Rucklidge, Shelby Hantz, Ian C Shaw NZMJ 20 September 2019, Vol 132 No 1502 ISSN 1175-8716 

Errors are a part of science and publishing and require publication of a correction when they are detected. The ICMJE guidelines state that errors serious enough to invalidate a paper’s results and conclusions may require retraction. The editor has received the notice below from the authors of the above manuscript.

We request retraction of our paper Are Over the Counter Fish Oil Supplements Safe, Effective and Accurate with Labelling – Analysis of 10 New Zealand Fish Oil Supplements because we made errors in the calculation of the amounts of EPA and DHA in five of the fish oil supplement capsules which means that we have underestimated the doses. All are now within 15% of label value. This, in turn, affects our assessment of compliance with health claims; however, they remain variable. Our assessment of mercury risk is unchanged.

We apologise for this error.

Julia Rucklidge, Shelby Hantz & Ian Shaw

The editor has reviewed the information available and this appears to be an honest error that has led to a major change in the direction and significance of the results, interpretations, and conclusions.

The manuscript has therefore been retracted and appropriate notifications made.

Frank Frizelle
Editor NZMJ

News for:

New Zealand

Media contact details for this story are only visible to registered journalists.