Abigail Allwood.

Doubt over earliest signs of life puts Aussie fossils back on top as the oldest

Embargoed until: Publicly released:

In 2016, researchers described 3.7-billion-year-old structures in Greenland rocks, a claim which if proven would bump Aussie fossils from the Pilbara out of the record books as the world's oldest form of life ever discovered. But further research has cast doubt on the the German fossils being biological, suggesting instead that they are rocks that have been shaped by geologic processes and not a sign of early life.So it looks like the Aussie fossils have a safe place in the record books for now.

Journal/conference: Nature

DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0610-4

Organisation/s: California Institute of Technology, USA

Media Release

From: Springer Nature

Earliest fossil findings disputed 

Rock structures that have previously been proposed to be the earliest-known remnants of life may be non-biological in origin, reports a study published online this week in Nature. This finding not only adds to our understanding of early life on Earth, but also highlights the importance of integrated, three-dimensional analyses in the search for similar life elsewhere, such as on Mars.

Earth’s oldest rocks, which are found in Greenland, are prime targets in the search for the earliest signs of life. This hunt is complicated by the fact that the original compositions and textures of the rocks having been largely obliterated by the bending, stretching and heating processes of metamorphism.

In 2016, researchers writing in Nature (https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19355) described 3.7-billion-year-old conical structures, each 1–4 cm high, in rocks from southwest Greenland. These, they argued, were stromatolites (layered sediments formed in shallow waters by mats of single-celled microbes), which suggested that the fossil record began 200 million years earlier than previously thought.

Abigail Allwood, Joel Hurowitz and colleagues analyse the three-dimensional shape, orientation and chemical composition of the alleged fossils. They find that, unlike stromatolites, the structures have no internal layers, lack chemical signatures of microbial activity, and are — when viewed three-dimensionally — actually ridge-shaped, not conical. Instead, they argue, the features are better interpreted as non-biological — the result of metamorphic alteration and deformation of marine sediments long after burial.

“The biological input to ancient stromato­lites is a long-standing controversy”, comments Mark van Zuilen in an associated News & Views. “Future research might lead to a firm understanding of the primary versus second­ary processes that shaped this rock.”


  • Springer Nature
    Web page
    Please link to the article in online versions of your report (the URL will go live after the embargo ends)

News for:



  • Structures

    Photograph of the putative stromatolitic structures in outcrop (arrows). Note that whereas most of the structures point downward (the rock has been overturned) some point upward (red arrow), which clearly indicates the structures did not grow upward from the sea floor. Glove for scale.

    File size: 3.4 MB

    Attribution: Abigail Allwood

    Permission category: © - Only use with this story

    Last modified: 18 Oct 2018 4:02am

    NOTE: High resolution files can only be downloaded here by registered journalists who are logged in.

Show less
Show more

Media contact details for this story are only visible to registered journalists.