Dogs have come in all shapes and sizes for more than 10,000 years

Publicly released:
Australia; International; NSW
Credit Lyndal Byford
Credit Lyndal Byford

Dogs already came in a wide variety of shapes and sizes long before modern breeding took hold, according to international research. The team used 3D analysis to examine 643 skulls spanning 50,000 years and found that distinct dog-like skull traits first appeared around 10,000 years ago. They found that dogs from this period had roughly half the range of shapes and sizes seen in modern dogs, but had twice that of their more ancient wolf ancestors. In an accompanying comment piece, an Australian expert says the research contributes to the wider understanding of domestication of dogs as a complex, multifaceted biological and cultural process in which thousands of years of human and animal history are intertwined. A second paper on ancient dog genomes looks at the role dogs played in ancient human societies as they spread across Eastern Eurasia.

Media release

From: AAAS

The diverse and distinctive forms of domestic dogs first appeared more than 10,000 years ago

While the range of physical diversity dogs show is often thought to be the result of intense breeding over the last 200 years, a new study – based on tracing 50,000 years of canid skull evolution – suggests domestic dogs began developing their distinctive forms thousands of years before humans started shaping modern breeds. Dogs at this time were shaped by early human influence, environmental shifts, and changing food sources. The origins and early diversification of domestic dogs are among the most debated topics in archaeology. Previous studies indicate that dogs first appeared during the Late Pleistocene, with major distinct genetic lineages appearing by at least 11,000 years before present. Because of their long association with humans, modern dogs exhibit an exceptional range of physical diversity, in both size and shape. It’s thought that much of this diversity is the direct result of intense breeding that happened in recent centuries. However, exactly when distinct dog variation first began to take shape is poorly understood and has been limited by the scarcity of Pleistocene specimens, the fragmentary condition of available remains, and the challenge of distinguishing early dogs from wolves based solely on skeletal morphology.

To trace how the physical forms of domestic dogs developed and diversified over time, Allowen Evin and colleagues used advanced 3D morphometric analysis to examine 643 canid skulls spanning 50,000 years, allowing them to measure subtle differences in skull shape and size with exceptional precision. By creating digital 3D models through laser scanning or photogrammetry, Evin et al. compared specific cranial features across ancient and modern dogs and their wild relatives. The findings show that distinct dog-like skull traits first appeared during the early Holocene, evidenced by 10,800-year-old remains recovered in Russia. Notably, all of the Ice Age canid skulls examined closely resembled wolves, suggesting that although visible domestication traits appeared only after 11,000 years ago, the process of domestication likely began earlier during the late Pleistocene, which is consistent with genetic evidence. The oldest known dogs from the Mesolithic and Neolithic possessed skulls that fell within the modern range of sizes but were typically smaller and less varied, lacking exaggerated traits that characterize many present-day breeds. Even so, their diversity was surprising; early Holocene dogs exhibited roughly half the morphological range seen in modern dogs and twice that of their Pleistocene wolf ancestors, suggesting that notable variation in dog form had already emerged millennia before modern breeding practices. The retention of wolf-like characteristics in some modern breeds highlights the gradual and complex evolution of the dog from their wild wolf ancestors. Evin et al. also found that ancient wolves were more varied in skull shape and size than they are today. “The domestication of dogs has captivated attention because of the close bonds that many humans share with dogs,” Melanie Fillios writes in a related Perspective. “[Evin et al.’s] research contributes to the wider understanding of domestication as a complex, multifaceted biological and cultural process in which thousands of years of human and animal history are intertwined.”

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research AAAS, Web page Please link to the article in online versions of your report (the URL will go live after the embargo ends).
Editorial / Opinion AAAS, Web page Please link to the article in online versions of your report (the URL will go live after the embargo ends).
Research AAAS, Web page Please link to the article in online versions of your report (the URL will go live after the embargo ends).
Journal/
conference:
Science
Organisation/s: The University of New England, University of Montpellier, France, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Lanzhou University, China
Funder: This work was supported by the Natural Environmental Research Council (grants NE/K005243/1, NE/K003259/1, NE/S007067/1, and NE/S00078X/1 to G.L.); the Arts and Humanities Research Council (UKRI grant AH/K006029/1 to R.K. and K.B.); the European Research Council (grant ERC-2019-STG-852573-DEMETER to A.E. and grant ERC-2013-StG-337574-UNDEAD to G.L.); the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (grant SSHRC IG435-2019-0706 to R.L.); the State Assignment of IGM SB RAS (grant 122041400252-1 to Y.K.); the State Assignment of ZIN RAS grant 125012800908-0 to M.S.); and the Fyssen Foundation (C.B.).
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.