Photo by kevin laminto on Unsplash
Photo by kevin laminto on Unsplash

Addressing cannabis-impaired driving

Embargoed until: Publicly released:
Not peer-reviewed: This work has not been scrutinised by independent experts, or the story does not contain research data to review (for example an opinion piece). If you are reporting on research that has yet to go through peer-review (eg. conference abstracts and preprints) be aware that the findings can change during the peer review process.

The International Council on Alcohol, Drugs & Traffic Safety (ICADTS) has released a series of fact sheets about cannabis-impaired driving to help inform policymakers around the globe.

Organisation/s: Swinburne University of Technology

Funder: No

Media release

From: Swinburne University of Technology

The International Council on Alcohol, Drugs & Traffic Safety (ICADTS) has released a series of fact sheets about cannabis-impaired driving to help inform policymakers around the globe.

The fact sheets were developed in consultation with leading impaired driving researchers, representing ICADTS Drugged Driving Work Group, co-chaired by Maastricht University (Netherlands), the Traffic Injury Research Foundation (TIRF/Canada) and Swinburne University of Technology (Australia).

Some of the most important facts for policymakers to be aware of, include:

•              Cannabis impairs driving, although the degree of impairment it produces varies substantially depending on the dose, the individual, and other factors.

•              Cannabis, when consumed alone, is associated with a modest increase in crash risk at the population level according to most studies which compared the presence versus the absence of cannabis.

•              A driver testing positive for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is insufficient to conclude driving impairment. Any impairment is dependent on not only the dose and route of administration but also the frequency of use and whether cannabis has been consumed alone or in combination with alcohol or other substances.

•              Alcohol and cannabis produce different patterns of impairing effects.

•              The combined effect of alcohol, even in low concentrations, and cannabis is particularly dangerous for driving.

•              The length of time needed to recover from cannabis intoxication is not fixed and depends on various factors, such as biological characteristics of consumers, type of cannabis consumed, dose, and method of ingestion.

Many countries have legalised recreational and/or medical cannabis use including Canada, Georgia, Malta, Mexico, South Africa, and Uruguay. In the United States, cannabis is legal in 19 states, 2 territories, and the District of Columbia. Many more jurisdictions, such as Germany, are contemplating such a move and this global trend is likely to continue.

Former ICADTS president and Maastricht University Professor Jan Ramaekers says, “Unlike alcohol, the research regarding the impairing effects of Δ9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC; the active ingredient of cannabis) on driving is much more complex because cannabis does not have a clear concentration-effect response.

“This means it’s difficult to conclude whether a specific THC concentration is indicative of driving impairment in an individual, making policy decisions much more complex.”

Swinburne Research Fellow Dr Thomas Arkell says when it comes to cannabis, there is very little consistency in how jurisdictions manage the issue of impaired driving.

“A priority moving forward is establishing greater uniformity in the types of tools used to assess impairment and the way in which results are recorded. This would allow us to pool data from different jurisdictions and better assess the impact of expanding legalisation on traffic safety. It would also help accelerate learning to enable researchers to provide clearer answers to policymakers on important legislative issues,” Dr Arkell says.

The Australian perspective

The issue of cannabis-impaired driving is particularly topical in Australia.

Professor Luke Downey, who leads the Drugs and Driving Research Unit at Swinburne says, “Roadside drug testing, which was first introduced in Victoria in 2004, is now routinely used in all Australian jurisdictions to deter and punish drug driving. The program is expanding in most jurisdictions, with Victoria Police alone now conducting some 150,000 tests per year.

“Patients using legally prescribed medical cannabis are not exempt from these tests (which target the presence of THC in saliva) and associated legal sanctions,” Professor Downey says.

The ICADTS work group has reached a consensus recommendation that medical cannabis consumers should not be subject to THC zero-tolerance laws that make it illegal to drive with any detectable level of THC, as is the case with some other types of impairing medications, but they should still be subject to impaired driving laws.

This approach, were it to be introduced, would treat legally prescribed medical cannabis in the same way as other medicines that can impair driving, such as benzodiazepines and opioids.

Download the Cannabis & Driving fact sheet series:

>        1: Introduction

>        2: Recent Experimental Evidence

>        3: Recent Epidemiological Evidence

>        4: Cannabis-Impaired Driving Detection & Toxicology

>        5: Policy & Legislative Issues

>        6: Medical Cannabis & Novel Psychoactive Substances (NPS)

News for:

Australia
International
VIC

Media contact details for this story are only visible to registered journalists.