EXPERT REACTION: Acupuncture could offer relief from menopause

Embargoed until: Publicly released:

Hot flushes? Mood swings? Sleepless nights? If you're having a hard time with menopause, you could consider acupuncture as an alternative if you who can’t, or don’t want to use hormone replacement therapy (HRT), according to Danish researchers. Seventy menopausal women participated in the study, with 36 of them receiving acupuncture weekly for 6 weeks while 34 received no acupuncture. After six weeks 80 per cent of the women indicated that they felt the sessions had helped them, and they were less troubled by hot flushes than those women who did not receive acupuncture. The lack of a placebo arm in the study means the results could also be explained by the placebo effect.

Journal/conference: BMJ Open

DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023637

Organisation/s: University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Media Release

From: The BMJ

Acupuncture may ease troublesome menopausal symptoms

Linked to reductions in hot flushes, sweating, mood swings, sleep disturbance, skin and hair problems

A brief course of acupuncture may help to ease troublesome menopausal symptoms, suggests a small study published in the online journal BMJ Open.

Among women dealing with moderate to severe symptoms, acupuncture was associated with reductions in hot flushes, excess sweating, mood swings, sleep disturbances, and skin and hair problems.

The findings prompt the researchers to conclude that acupuncture offers “a realistic” treatment option for women who can’t, or don’t want to, use hormone replacement therapy (HRT).

Menopausal symptoms are common, and depending on their severity, can have a major impact on quality of life, health and wellbeing, as well as productivity.

Hot flushes are one of the most common symptoms, and these can go on for several years. But others include heavy sweating, emotional vulnerability, sleep disturbances, fatigue, ‘fuzzy’ brain, joint pain, vaginal dryness and reduced sex drive.

Hormonal and other drugs can treat the various symptoms, but they are not without side effects. And the evidence for other non-pharmacological approaches, such as exercise, relaxation, and herbal/dietary remedies, isn’t very convincing, say the researchers.

Previous research suggests that acupuncture might be helpful, but design flaws or quality issues have undermined the findings, say the researchers.

In a bid to address this, they randomly allocated 70 menopausal women who met their inclusion criteria to either five weeks of standardised Western medical acupuncture, using pre-defined acupuncture points, or no acupuncture until after six weeks.

Each weekly session lasted 15 minutes, and was delivered by Danish family doctors from nine different general practices, who had additionally trained in acupuncture, and had been practising it for an average of 14 years.

Each participant completed a validated Meno Scores (MSQ) questionnaire–designed to measure outcomes from the patient’s perspective–before their first session and then again after 3, 6, 8, 11 and 26 weeks.

The MSQ comprised 11 graded scales for each of: hot flushes; day and night sweats; general sweating; sleep disturbance; emotional vulnerability; memory changes; skin and hair problems; physical symptoms; abdominal symptoms; urinary and vaginal symptoms; and fatigue.

At six weeks most (80%) of the women in the acupuncture group, said that they felt that the sessions had helped them.

And compared with those who had not been given acupuncture, they were significantly less troubled by hot flushes–a difference that was already apparent after 3 weeks of ‘treatment’.

Statistically significant differences also emerged between the two groups in the severity/frequency of day and night sweats, general sweating, sleep disturbances, emotional and physical symptoms, and skin and hair problems.

The drop-out rate was low, with just one woman failing to complete all five acupuncture sessions, and no serious side effects were reported.

The researchers acknowledge that the treatment period lasted just five weeks and that a major difficulty in all acupuncture trials is the lack of a proper comparator.

This means that a placebo effect can’t be ruled out, and further discussions are warranted about what level of evidence is therefore acceptable, particularly when it’s impossible to accurately explain the underlying factors behind the results, they add.

Nevertheless, they suggest that their findings show that a brief course of acupuncture by suitably trained professionals is feasible in routine primary care for both doctors and patients.

“Not all menopausal women need or request treatment, and we believe this acupuncture intervention is most relevant to women who experience moderate-to-severe menopausal symptoms,” they write.

“Acupuncture for menopausal symptoms is a realistic option for women who cannot, or do not wish to use [hormone therapy],” they conclude.


  • The BMJ
    Web page
    The URL will go live after the embargo ends

Expert Reaction

These comments have been collated by the Science Media Centre to provide a variety of expert perspectives on this issue. Feel free to use these quotes in your stories. Views expressed are the personal opinions of the experts named. They do not represent the views of the SMC or any other organisation unless specifically stated.

Les Rose is a Retired Clinical Research Scientist, and Trustee of the Charity HealthWatch

As the authors state, the major limitation is that the study was not blinded. It's curious that they say the outcome assessors were blinded, when the outcomes were all patient-reported. The patients were not of course blinded.

I am not sure it's fair to say that there is no validated sham acupuncture technique - I found several such studies, (e.g. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20351375). I suppose it depends on what you mean by `validated', and the authors take the view that there will always be some residual effect of sham acupuncture. But the alternative view is that both real and sham are placebos. I don't think this study dismisses the possibility that acupuncture is a theatrical placebo.

Last updated: 21 Feb 2019 10:03am
Declared conflicts of interest:
None declared.
Dr Ali Abbara is a member of the Society for Endocrinology and Clinical Senior Lecturer in Endocrinology at Imperial College London

Hot flushes are hugely troublesome for women going through menopause and can affect their ability to sleep as well as general well-being. So, more treatments are certainly welcome to help treat these women. We know that psychological treatments like cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) can be helpful, so the findings seems plausible, however it is difficult from the way the study was carried out to make any firm conclusions about how effective acupuncture is for the treatment of hot flushes. Whilst it is not a drug, acupuncture does still have a cost attached, and therefore it is important to be sure that this treatment actually works before we recommend it. Although the study was randomised, which is a strength, it was not ‘blinded’ meaning that patients knew whether they were receiving the treatment or not. This means that the benefit observed could have been due to the ‘placebo’ effect, whereby people may experience a benefit because they are expecting one as they know that they are receiving a treatment. In order to get around this, it would have been necessary to do a ‘sham' or ‘fake' acupuncture in the control group, so that patients in both groups of the study believed that they could be receiving the treatment and the placebo effect would have been equally present in both groups.

Certainly, as acupuncture is not particularly harmful, and if people want to try it and are willing to pay for it, then it is fine to do so, but this study is not able to provide strong enough evidence that it definitely works for treatment of hot flushes.

Last updated: 21 Feb 2019 10:02am
Declared conflicts of interest:
None declared.
Dr Channa Jayasena is a member of the Society for Endocrinology and Clinical Senior Lecturer & Consultant in Reproductive Endocrinology at Imperial College London & Hammersmith Hospital

Menopausal flushes will affect most women at some point. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is an excellent treatment but is not tolerated by all women. Also, HRT cannot be given to women with certain type of cancer. This leave a huge ‘gap in the market’ for simple and safe therapies to reduce hot flush symptoms. The authors show that acupuncture can reduce flush symptoms. However, we also know that flush symptoms can more than halve with a placebo. I suspect that most (if not all) of the effect of acupuncture is a placebo effect; but is that a really bad thing? Anything that is safe, affordable and helps the well-being of patients while reducing symptoms is worth considering if HRT is not an option.

Last updated: 21 Feb 2019 9:57am
Declared conflicts of interest:
None declared.
Prof David Colquhoun is Professor of Pharmacology, University College London (UCL)

It's been established for at least 70 years that blinding is an absolutely essential part of clinical trial design, and it's deeply shocking that the BMJ should publish a test of acupuncture in which the patients were aware of which group they were in.  There are at least two ways in which sham acupuncture could have been done. The fact that it wasn't means that this study is as likely to be misleading as it is to be helpful.

Given that there have already been well over 3500 trials of acupuncture, the best of which show little or no difference between "real" acupuncture and sham, the prior probability of there being a real effect in this trial must be quite low, and the corresponding risk of the results being false positives is high.  The authors themselves cite a Cochrane review which concluded that there was no good evidence for acupuncture helping with menopausal problems. They also cite (ref 41) a far bigger trial with proper sham controls that showed no effect whatsoever of acupuncture on menopausal hot flushes. 

It beats me why, in the light of all this previous information, the authors should have spent time on yet another small and poorly-controlled trial. And it's even more puzzling why the BMJ should publish it.”

A technical note:

There are also some statistical problems. It's stated that corrections were made for multiple comparisons - "the false discovery rate [was controlled] at 5% with the method of Benjamini and Hochberg)." 

But in fact in Table 3, and in the abstract, uncorrected p values are reported.  The only mention of the correction is in a footnote to Table 3 - "‡Significant at a 0.01 level to control for the false discovery rate at 0.05."

No details are supplied but this comment suggests that p = 0.01 has been chosen as a threshold for declaring "statistical significance".  Since 12 comparisons are made Table 3, the Bonferroni correction would give p = 0.05/12 = 0.004. 

Furthermore all this gives you is a corrected p value.  It is now very well established that p values (as commonly misinterpreted) overstates the evidence against the null hypothesis.

Last updated: 21 Feb 2019 9:56am
Declared conflicts of interest:
None declared.
Dr James Doidge is a Senior Statistician, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC), UK

‘Pragmatic’ trials study treatment effects as they would occur in real-life settings, without excluding things like placebo effects. We know that treatments that are elaborate, prolonged or invasive can have heightened placebo effects, and acupuncture is all of these. But placebo effects are real nonetheless, and can translate into measurable physiological outcomes—outcomes that were unfortunately ignored in this study. Patient-reported outcomes are important, but also much more susceptible to nonspecific effects such as placebo. Placebo effects are particularly valuable for conditions with few evidence-based treatments available, such as hot flushes, and for people who are unable to tolerate other treatments. It is therefore disappointing that this study excluded people who had received other treatments (even herbal remedies). In fact more people were excluded from the study than were included, and this not-so-pragmatic element of study design may limit the generalisability of findings, especially in light of how many people experience moderate-to-severe hot flushes during menopause.

Last updated: 21 Feb 2019 9:53am
Declared conflicts of interest:
None declared.
Prof Edzard Ernst is Emeritus Professor of Complementary Medicine, University of Exeter

Like much of acupuncture research, this is very poor science, in my view.  The study had no control group capable of accounting for the often powerful placebo effects of acupuncture.  Therefore, the observed outcomes could be (and most probably are) entirely unrelated to acupuncture per se.  The authors nevertheless conclude that ‘acupuncture treatment produced a fast and clinically relevant reduction in moderate-to-severe menopausal symptoms’ – this conclusion is not backed up by evidence and so researchers, policy makers and patients may be misled.  I am puzzled to see that the BMJ-Open publishes such a study.

Last updated: 21 Feb 2019 9:51am
Declared conflicts of interest:
None declared.

News for:


Media contact details for this story are only visible to registered journalists.